Phase III, randomized trial (CheckMate 057) of nivolumab (NIVO) versus docetaxel (DOC) in advanced non-squamous cell (non-SQ) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Luis Paz‐Ares(Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío), Leora Horn(Vanderbilt University), Hossein Borghaei(Fox Chase Cancer Center), David R. Spigel(Sarah Cannon), Martin Steins, Neal Ready(Duke Medical Center), Laura Q.M. Chow(University of Washington), Everett E. Vokes(University of Chicago), Enriqueta Felip(Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari), Esther Holgado, Fabrice Barlési(Aix-Marseille Université), Martin Kohlhäeufl(Klinik Schillerhöhe), Óscar Gerardo Arrieta Rodríguez(Instituto Nacional de Cancerología), Marco Angelo Burgio(Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori), Jérôme Fayette(Centre Léon Bérard), Scott Gettinger(Yale University), Christopher Harbison(Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States)), Cécile Dorange(Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States)), Friedrich Graf Finckenstein(Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States)), Julie R. Brahmer(Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
June 20, 2015
Cited by 147

Abstract

LBA109 Background: Options for advanced non-SQ NSCLC patients (pts) who progress after platinum-based doublet chemotherapy (PT-DC) are limited, with minimal improvement in overall survival (OS). We report results from a randomized, global phase III study of NIVO, a fully human IgG4 programmed death-1 (PD-1) immune checkpoint inhibitor antibody, vs DOC in pts with advanced non-SQ NSCLC after failure of PT-DC and tyrosine kinase inhibitor, if eligible. Methods: Pts were randomized to NIVO 3 mg/kg Q2W (n=292) or DOC 75 mg/m2 Q3W (n=290) until progression or discontinuation due to toxicity/other reasons. Primary objective was OS; Secondary objectives were investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR; per RECIST v1.1), progression-free survival (PFS), efficacy by PD-L1 expression, quality of life, and safety. Results: NIVO demonstrated superior OS (HR=0.73; 96% CI: 0.59, 0.89; P=0.00155) and improved ORR (19.2% vs 12.4%; P=0.0235). HR for PFS was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.77, 1.11; P=0.393). PD-L1 expression was associated with benefit from NIVO (Table). In PD-L1+ pts, NIVO showed improved efficacy across all endpoints at predefined 1%, 5%, and 10% cut- points. Grade 3–5 drug-related AEs occurred in 10.5% (30/287) of NIVO and 53.7% (144/268) of DOC pts. No deaths were related to NIVO vs 1 DOC-related death. After discontinuation, 42.1% of NIVO and 49.7% of DOC pts received subsequent systemic therapy. Conclusions: NIVO demonstrated superior OS vs DOC in pts with advanced non-SQ NSCLC after failure of PT-DC. The safety profile of NIVO 3 mg/kg Q2W was favorable vs DOC. NIVO demonstrated survival benefit across histologies in two randomized phase III trials. Clinical trial information: NCT01673867. [Table: see text]


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis