Phase 3 Studies Comparing Brodalumab with Ustekinumab in Psoriasis

Mark Lebwohl(Probity Medical Research), Bruce Strober(University of Connecticut), Alan Menter(Baylor University Medical Center), Kenneth B. Gordon(Northwestern University), Jolanta Węgłowska, L. Puig(Hospital de Sant Pau), Kim Papp, Lynda Spelman(Probity Medical Research), Darryl Toth(XLV Diagnostics (Canada)), Francisco A. Kerdel(Florida Academic Dermatology Center), April W. Armstrong(University of Colorado Denver), Georg Stingl(Medical University of Vienna), Alexa B. Kimball(Massachusetts General Hospital), H. Bachelez(Délégation Paris 7), Jashin J. Wu(Kaiser Permanente West Los Angeles Medical Center), Jeffrey Crowley, Richard G. Langley(Dalhousie University), Tomasz Blicharski, C. Paul(Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier), J.‐P. Lacour(Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice), Stephen K. Tyring(The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston), Leon Kircik(Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai), Sergio Chimenti(University of Rome Tor Vergata), Kristina Callis Duffin(University of Utah), Jerry Bagel(VA New Jersey Health Care System), John Koo(University of California, San Francisco), Gary Aras(Amgen (United States)), Joanne Li(Amgen (United States)), Wenjie Song(Amgen (United States)), Cassandra E. Milmont(Amgen (United States)), Yifei Shi(Amgen (United States)), Ngozi Erondu(Amgen (United States)), Paul Klekotka(Amgen (United States)), Brian L. Kotzin(Amgen (United States)), Ajay Nirula(Amgen (United States))
New England Journal of Medicine
September 30, 2015
Cited by 803Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Early clinical studies suggested that the anti-interleukin-17 receptor A monoclonal antibody brodalumab has efficacy in the treatment of psoriasis. METHODS: In two phase 3 studies (AMAGINE-2 and AMAGINE-3), patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis were randomly assigned to receive brodalumab (210 mg or 140 mg every 2 weeks), ustekinumab (45 mg for patients with a body weight ≤100 kg and 90 mg for patients >100 kg), or placebo. At week 12, patients receiving brodalumab were randomly assigned again to receive a brodalumab maintenance dose of 210 mg every 2 weeks or 140 mg every 2 weeks, every 4 weeks, or every 8 weeks; patients receiving ustekinumab continued to receive ustekinumab every 12 weeks, and patients receiving placebo received 210 mg of brodalumab every 2 weeks. The primary aims were to evaluate the superiority of brodalumab over placebo at week 12 with respect to at least a 75% reduction in the psoriasis area-and-severity index score (PASI 75) and a static physician's global assessment (sPGA) score of 0 or 1 (clear or almost clear skin), as well as the superiority of brodalumab over ustekinumab at week 12 with respect to a 100% reduction in PASI score (PASI 100). RESULTS: At week 12, the PASI 75 response rates were higher with brodalumab at the 210-mg and 140-mg doses than with placebo (86% and 67%, respectively, vs. 8% [AMAGINE-2] and 85% and 69%, respectively, vs. 6% [AMAGINE-3]; P<0.001); the rates of sPGA scores of 0 or 1 were also higher with brodalumab (P<0.001). The week 12 PASI 100 response rates were significantly higher with 210 mg of brodalumab than with ustekinumab (44% vs. 22% [AMAGINE-2] and 37% vs. 19% [AMAGINE-3], P<0.001). The PASI 100 response rates with 140 mg of brodalumab were 26% in AMAGINE-2 (P=0.08 for the comparison with ustekinumab) and 27% in AMAGINE-3 (P=0.007). Rates of neutropenia were higher with brodalumab and with ustekinumab than with placebo. Mild or moderate candida infections were more frequent with brodalumab than with ustekinumab or placebo. Through week 52, the rates of serious infectious episodes were 1.0 (AMAGINE-2) and 1.3 (AMAGINE-3) per 100 patient-years of exposure to brodalumab. CONCLUSIONS: Brodalumab treatment resulted in significant clinical improvements in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. (Funded by Amgen; AMAGINE-2 and AMAGINE-3 ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT01708603 and NCT01708629.).


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis