Optimal Combinations of Broadly Neutralizing Antibodies for Prevention and Treatment of HIV-1 Clade C Infection

Kshitij Wagh(Los Alamos National Laboratory), Tanmoy Bhattacharya(Los Alamos National Laboratory), Carolyn Williamson(University of Cape Town), Alex Robles(Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center), Madeleine Bayne(Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center), Garrity Jetta(Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center), Michael Rist(Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center), Cecilia Rademeyer(University of Cape Town), Hyejin Yoon(Los Alamos National Laboratory), Alan S. Lapedes(Los Alamos National Laboratory), Hongmei Gao(Duke Medical Center), Kelli Greene(Duke Medical Center), Mark K. Louder(National Institutes of Health), Rui Kong(National Institutes of Health), Salim S. Abdool Karim(University of KwaZulu-Natal), Dennis R. Burton(Scripps Research Institute), Dan H. Barouch(Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center), Michel C. Nussenzweig(Rockefeller University), John R. Mascola(National Institutes of Health), Lynn Morris(University of the Witwatersrand), David C. Montefiori(Duke Medical Center), Bette Korber(Los Alamos National Laboratory), Michael S. Seaman(Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center)
PLoS Pathogens
March 30, 2016
Cited by 200Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

The identification of a new generation of potent broadly neutralizing HIV-1 antibodies (bnAbs) has generated substantial interest in their potential use for the prevention and/or treatment of HIV-1 infection. While combinations of bnAbs targeting distinct epitopes on the viral envelope (Env) will likely be required to overcome the extraordinary diversity of HIV-1, a key outstanding question is which bnAbs, and how many, will be needed to achieve optimal clinical benefit. We assessed the neutralizing activity of 15 bnAbs targeting four distinct epitopes of Env, including the CD4-binding site (CD4bs), the V1/V2-glycan region, the V3-glycan region, and the gp41 membrane proximal external region (MPER), against a panel of 200 acute/early clade C HIV-1 Env pseudoviruses. A mathematical model was developed that predicted neutralization by a subset of experimentally evaluated bnAb combinations with high accuracy. Using this model, we performed a comprehensive and systematic comparison of the predicted neutralizing activity of over 1,600 possible double, triple, and quadruple bnAb combinations. The most promising bnAb combinations were identified based not only on breadth and potency of neutralization, but also other relevant measures, such as the extent of complete neutralization and instantaneous inhibitory potential (IIP). By this set of criteria, triple and quadruple combinations of bnAbs were identified that were significantly more effective than the best double combinations, and further improved the probability of having multiple bnAbs simultaneously active against a given virus, a requirement that may be critical for countering escape in vivo. These results provide a rationale for advancing bnAb combinations with the best in vitro predictors of success into clinical trials for both the prevention and treatment of HIV-1 infection.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis