A Comparison of Continuous Intravenous Epoprostenol (Prostacyclin) with Conventional Therapy for Primary Pulmonary Hypertension

Robyn J. Barst(Columbia University), Lewis J. Rubin(University of Maryland, Baltimore), Walker Long(University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), Michael D. McGoon, Stuart Rich(University of Illinois Chicago), David B. Badesch(University of Colorado Health), Bertron Μ. Groves(University of Colorado Health), Victor F. Tapson, Robert C. Bourge(University of Alabama at Birmingham), Bruce H. Brundage, Spencer K. Koerner(Cedars-Sinai Medical Center), David Langleben(Jewish General Hospital), Cesar A. Keller(Baylor College of Medicine), Srinivas Murali(University of Pittsburgh), Barry F. Uretsky(University of Pittsburgh), Linda Clayton, Maria M. Jöbsis, Shelmer D. Blackburn, Denise Shortino, James W. Crow
New England Journal of Medicine
February 1, 1996
Cited by 2,692Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Primary pulmonary hypertension is a progressive disease for which no treatment has been shown in a prospective, randomized trial to improve survival. METHODS: We conducted a 12-week prospective, randomized, multicenter open trial comparing the effects of the continuous intravenous infusion of epoprostenol (formerly called prostacyclin) plus conventional therapy with those of conventional therapy alone in 81 patients with severe primary pulmonary hypertension (New York Heart Association functional class III or IV). RESULTS: Exercise capacity was improved in the 41 patients treated with epoprostenol (median distance walked in six minutes, 362 m at 12 weeks vs. 315 m at base line), but it decreased in the 40 patients treated with conventional therapy alone (204 m at 12 weeks vs. 270 m at base line; P < 0.002 for the comparison of the treatment groups). Indexes of the quality of life were improved only in the epoprostenol group (P < 0.01). Hemodynamics improved at 12 weeks in the epoprostenol-treated patients. The changes in mean pulmonary-artery pressure for the epoprostenol and control groups were -8 percent and +3 percent, respectively (difference in mean change, -6.7 mm Hg; 95 percent confidence interval, -10.7 to -2.6 mm Hg; P < 0.002), and the mean changes in pulmonary vascular resistance for the epoprostenol and control groups were -21 percent and +9 percent, respectively (difference in mean change, -4.9 mm Hg/liter/min; 95 percent confidence interval, -7.6 to -2.3 mm Hg/liter/min; P < 0.001). Eight patients died during the study, all of whom had been randomly assigned to conventional therapy (P = 0.003). Serious complications included four episodes of catheter-related sepsis and one thrombotic event. CONCLUSIONS: As compared with conventional therapy, the continuous intravenous infusion of epoprostenol produced symptomatic and hemodynamic improvement, as well as improved survival in patients with severe primary pulmonary hypertension.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis