Invasive mammal eradication on islands results in substantial conservation gains

Holly P. Jones(Northern Illinois University), Nick D. Holmes, Stuart H. M. Butchart(BirdLife international), Bernie R. Tershy(University of California, Santa Cruz), Peter J. Kappes(Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife), Ilse Corkery(University College Cork), Alfonso Aguirre‐Muñoz, Doug P. Armstrong(Massey University), Elsa Bonnaud(Ecologie, Société, Evolution), Andrew A. Burbidge, Karl J. Campbell(The University of Queensland), Franck Courchamp(Ecologie, Société, Evolution), P. E. Cowan(Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research), Richard Cuthbert(Royal Society for the Protection of Birds), Steve Ebbert(United States Fish and Wildlife Service), Piero Genovesi(WWF Italia), Gregg R. Howald, Bradford S. Keitt, Stephen W. Kress(National Audubon Society), Colin M. Miskelly(Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa), Steffen Oppel(Royal Society for the Protection of Birds), Sally Poncet(South Atlantic Environmental Research Institute), Mark J. Rauzon(Laney College), Gérard Rocamora(University of Seychelles), James C. Russell(University of Auckland), Araceli Samaniego‐Herrera, Philip J. Seddon(University of Otago), Dena R. Spatz(University of California, Santa Cruz), David R. Towns(Auckland University of Technology), Donald A. Croll(University of California, Santa Cruz)
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
March 21, 2016
Cited by 504Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

More than US$21 billion is spent annually on biodiversity conservation. Despite their importance for preventing or slowing extinctions and preserving biodiversity, conservation interventions are rarely assessed systematically for their global impact. Islands house a disproportionately higher amount of biodiversity compared with mainlands, much of which is highly threatened with extinction. Indeed, island species make up nearly two-thirds of recent extinctions. Islands therefore are critical targets of conservation. We used an extensive literature and database review paired with expert interviews to estimate the global benefits of an increasingly used conservation action to stem biodiversity loss: eradication of invasive mammals on islands. We found 236 native terrestrial insular faunal species (596 populations) that benefitted through positive demographic and/or distributional responses from 251 eradications of invasive mammals on 181 islands. Seven native species (eight populations) were negatively impacted by invasive mammal eradication. Four threatened species had their International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List extinction-risk categories reduced as a direct result of invasive mammal eradication, and no species moved to a higher extinction-risk category. We predict that 107 highly threatened birds, mammals, and reptiles on the IUCN Red List-6% of all these highly threatened species-likely have benefitted from invasive mammal eradications on islands. Because monitoring of eradication outcomes is sporadic and limited, the impacts of global eradications are likely greater than we report here. Our results highlight the importance of invasive mammal eradication on islands for protecting the world's most imperiled fauna.


Related Papers