How to tackle the molecular species inventory for an industrialized nation—lessons from the first phase of the German Barcode of Life initiative GBOL (2012–2015)

Matthias F. Geiger(Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig), Jonas J. Astrin(Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig), Thomas Borsch(Botanic Garden and Botanical Museum Berlin), Ulrich Burkhardt(Senckenberg Museum für Naturkunde Görlitz), Peter Grobe(Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig), Ralf Hand(Botanic Garden and Botanical Museum Berlin), Axel Hausmann(Bavarian State Collection of Zoology), Karin Hohberg(Senckenberg Museum für Naturkunde Görlitz), Lars Krogmann(Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart), Matthias Lutz(University of Tübingen), Cesar Monje(Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart), Bernhard Misof(Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig), Jérôme Morinière(Bavarian State Collection of Zoology), Kai Müller, Stephanie J. Pietsch(Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig), Dietmar Quandt(University of Bonn), Björn Rulik(Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig), Markus Scholler(State Museum of Natural History Karlsruhe), Walter Traunspurger(Bielefeld University), Gerhard Haszprunar(Bavarian State Collection of Zoology), Wolfgang J. Wägele(Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig)
Genome
March 17, 2016
Cited by 80Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Biodiversity loss is mainly driven by human activity. While concern grows over the fate of hot spots of biodiversity, contemporary species losses still prevail in industrialized nations. Therefore, strategies were formulated to halt or reverse the loss, driven by evidence for its value for ecosystem services. Maintenance of the latter through conservation depends on correctly identified species. To this aim, the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research is funding the GBOL project, a consortium of natural history collections, botanic gardens, and universities working on a barcode reference database for the country's fauna and flora. Several noticeable findings could be useful for future campaigns: (i) validating taxon lists to serve as a taxonomic backbone is time-consuming, but without alternative; (ii) offering financial incentives to taxonomic experts, often citizen scientists, is indispensable; (iii) completion of the libraries for widespread species enables analyses of environmental samples, but the process may not hold pace with technological advancements; (iv) discoveries of new species are among the best stories for the media; (v) a commitment to common data standards and repositories is needed, as well as transboundary cooperation between nations; (vi) after validation, all data should be published online via the BOLD to make them searchable for external users and to allow cross-checking with data from other countries.


Related Papers