Immunodynamics: a cancer immunotherapy trials network review of immune monitoring in immuno-oncology clinical trials

on behalf of the Cancer Immunotherapy Trials Network (CITN)(Cancer Institute (WIA)), Holbrook E. Kohrt(University of California, Los Angeles), Paul C. Tumeh(University of California, Los Angeles), Don Benson(Ohio State University Hospital), Nina Bhardwaj(Mount Sinai Hospital), Joshua Brody(Cornell University), Silvia C. Formenti(Cornell University), Bernard A. Fox(Inserm), Jérôme Galon(Inserm), Carl H. June(Eli Lilly (United States)), Michael Kalos(Eli Lilly (United States)), Ilan R. Kirsch(Adaptive Biotechnologies (United States)), Thomas O. Kleen(Délégation Paris 5), Guido Kroemer(Délégation Paris 5), Lewis L. Lanier(University of California, San Francisco), Ron Levy(Duke University), H. Kim Lyerly(Duke University), Holden T. Maecker(Cardiovascular Institute of the South), Aurélien Marabelle(Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon), Jos Melenhorst(University of Minnesota), Jeffrey D. Miller(Clinica Universidad de Navarra), Ignacio Melero(Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center), Kunle Odunsi(Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center), Karolina Palucka(Brooke Army Medical Center), George E. Peoples(University of California System), Antoni Ribas(Adaptive Biotechnologies (United States)), Harlan Robins(Adaptive Biotechnologies (United States)), William H. Robinson(Stanford Medicine), Tito Serafini(University of Wisconsin–Madison), Paul M. Sondel(University of Wisconsin–Madison), Éric Vivier(Moffitt Cancer Center), Jeffrey S. Weber(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Jedd D. Wolchok(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Laurence Zitvogel(University of Washington), Mary L. Disis(University of Washington), Martin A. Cheever(Cape Town HVTN Immunology Laboratory / Hutchinson Centre Research Institute of South Africa)
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
February 24, 2016
Cited by 69Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

The efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 targeted therapies in addition to anti-CTLA-4 solidifies immunotherapy as a modality to add to the anticancer arsenal. Despite raising the bar of clinical efficacy, immunologically targeted agents raise new challenges to conventional drug development paradigms by highlighting the limited relevance of assessing standard pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD). Specifically, systemic and intratumoral immune effects have not consistently correlated with standard relationships between systemic dose, toxicity, and efficacy for cytotoxic therapies. Hence, PK and PD paradigms remain inadequate to guide the selection of doses and schedules, both starting and recommended Phase 2 for immunotherapies. The promise of harnessing the immune response against cancer must also be considered in light of unique and potentially serious toxicities. Refining immune endpoints to better inform clinical trial design represents a high priority challenge. The Cancer Immunotherapy Trials Network investigators review the immunodynamic effects of specific classes of immunotherapeutic agents to focus immune assessment modalities and sites, both systemic and importantly intratumoral, which are critical to the success of the rapidly growing field of immuno-oncology.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis