Homologous Recombination Deficiency (HRD) Score Predicts Response to Platinum-Containing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Melinda L. Telli(Stanford University), Kirsten M. Timms(Myriad Genetics), Julia Reid(Myriad Genetics), Bryan T. Hennessy(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Gordon B. Mills(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Kristin C. Jensen(Stanford University), Zoltán Szállási(Boston Children's Hospital), William T. Barry(Harvard University), Eric P. Winer(Harvard University), Nadine Tung(Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center), Steven J. Isakoff(Harvard University), Paula D. Ryan(Massachusetts General Hospital), April Greene-Colozzi(Dana-Farber Cancer Institute), Alexander Gutin(Myriad Genetics), Zaina Sangale(Myriad Genetics), Diana Iliev(Myriad Genetics), Chris Neff(Myriad Genetics), Victor Abkevich(Myriad Genetics), Joshua T. Jones(Myriad Genetics), Jerry S. Lanchbury(Myriad Genetics), Anne‐Renee Hartman(Myriad Genetics), Judy E. Garber(Harvard University), James M. Ford(Stanford University), Daniel P. Silver(Harvard University), Andrea L. Richardson(Brigham and Women's Hospital)
Clinical Cancer Research
March 8, 2016
Cited by 1,155Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

PURPOSE: BRCA1/2-mutated and some sporadic triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC) have DNA repair defects and are sensitive to DNA-damaging therapeutics. Recently, three independent DNA-based measures of genomic instability were developed on the basis of loss of heterozygosity (LOH), telomeric allelic imbalance (TAI), and large-scale state transitions (LST). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We assessed a combined homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) score, an unweighted sum of LOH, TAI, and LST scores, in three neoadjuvant TNBC trials of platinum-containing therapy. We then tested the association of HR deficiency, defined as HRD score ≥42 or BRCA1/2 mutation, with response to platinum-based therapy. RESULTS: In a trial of neoadjuvant platinum, gemcitabine, and iniparib, HR deficiency predicted residual cancer burden score of 0 or I (RCB 0/I) and pathologic complete response (pCR; OR = 4.96, P = 0.0036; OR = 6.52, P = 0.0058). HR deficiency remained a significant predictor of RCB 0/I when adjusted for clinical variables (OR = 5.86, P = 0.012). In two other trials of neoadjuvant cisplatin therapy, HR deficiency predicted RCB 0/I and pCR (OR = 10.18, P = 0.0011; OR = 17.00, P = 0.0066). In a multivariable model of RCB 0/I, HR deficiency retained significance when clinical variables were included (OR = 12.08, P = 0.0017). When restricted to BRCA1/2 nonmutated tumors, response was higher in patients with high HRD scores: RCB 0/I P = 0.062, pCR P = 0.063 in the neoadjuvant platinum, gemcitabine, and iniparib trial; RCB 0/I P = 0.0039, pCR P = 0.018 in the neoadjuvant cisplatin trials. CONCLUSIONS: HR deficiency identifies TNBC tumors, including BRCA1/2 nonmutated tumors more likely to respond to platinum-containing therapy. Clin Cancer Res; 22(15); 3764-73. ©2016 AACR.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis