DETECTION OF THE SPLASHBACK RADIUS AND HALO ASSEMBLY BIAS OF MASSIVE GALAXY CLUSTERS

Surhud More(Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe), Hironao Miyatake(Jet Propulsion Laboratory), Masahiro Takada(Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe), Benedikt Diemer(Center for Astrophysics Harvard & Smithsonian), Andrey V. Kravtsov(Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory), Neal Dalal(University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign), Anupreeta More(Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe), Ryoma Murata(Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe), Rachel Mandelbaum(Carnegie Mellon University), Eduardo Rozo(University of Arizona), E. S. Rykoff(SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory), Masamune Oguri(Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe), David N. Spergel(Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe)
The Astrophysical Journal
June 27, 2016
Cited by 178Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

ABSTRACT We show that the projected number density profiles of Sloan Digital Sky Survey photometric galaxies around galaxy clusters display strong evidence for the splashback radius, a sharp halo edge corresponding to the location of the first orbital apocenter of satellite galaxies after their infall. We split the clusters into two subsamples with different mean projected radial distances of their members, , at fixed richness and redshift. The sample with smaller has a smaller ratio of the splashback radius to the traditional halo boundary than the subsample with larger , indicative of different mass accretion rates for these subsamples. The same subsamples were recently used by Miyatake et al. to show that their large-scale clustering differs despite their similar weak lensing masses, demonstrating strong evidence for halo assembly bias. We expand on this result by presenting a 6.6 σ difference in the clustering amplitudes of these samples using cluster–photometric galaxy cross-correlations. This measurement is a clear indication that halo clustering depends on parameters other than halo mass. If is related to the mass assembly history of halos, the measurement is a manifestation of the halo assembly bias. However, our measured splashback radii are smaller, while the strength of the assembly bias signal is stronger, than the predictions of collisionless Λ cold dark matter simulations. We show that dynamical friction, cluster mis-centering, or projection effects are not likely to be the sole source of these discrepancies. However, further investigations regarding unknown catastrophic weak lensing or cluster identification systematics are warranted.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis