Final analysis of a phase IB/randomized phase II study of gemcitabine (G) plus placebo (P) or vismodegib (V), a hedgehog (Hh) pathway inhibitor, in patients (pts) with metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC): A University of Chicago phase II consortium study.

Daniel Virgil Thomas Catenacci(University of Chicago), Nathan Bahary(University of Pittsburgh Medical Center), Sreenivasa Nattam(Fort Wayne Medical Institute), Robert Marsh(NorthShore University HealthSystem), James A. Wallace(Ingalls Memorial Hospital), Lakshmi Rajdev(Montefiore Medical Center), Deirdre Jill Cohen(New York University), Bethany Sleckman(Mercy Medical Center), Heinz‐Josef Lenz(University of Southern California), Patrick J. Stiff(Loyola University Medical Center), Sachdev Thomas(Illinois CancerCare), Peng Xu(University of Chicago), Les Henderson(University of Chicago), M. Naomi Horiba(University of Maryland, Baltimore), Michael W. Vannier(University of Chicago), Theodore Karrison(University of Chicago Medical Center), Walter M. Stadler(University of Chicago), Hedy L. Kindler(University of Chicago Medical Center)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
May 20, 2013
Cited by 39

Abstract

4012 Background: Sonic Hh (SHh), the ligand for the Hh pathway, is over-expressed in >80% of PC. V had activity in preclinical murine PC models leading to increased tumor perfusion, enhanced tumor delivery of G, and an improvement in survival. Methods: We conducted a placebo-controlled, phase IB/randomized phase II trial of GV or GP. Eligible pts, KPS 80-100, had untreated metastatic PC, or had completed adjuvant therapy > 6 months (mo) prior. Primary endpoint: progression-free survival (PFS). Correlatives: serial SHh serum levels; serial perfusion CT imaging. All pts received G 1000mg/m 2 over 30 minutes, days (D) 1, 8, 15, Q28D. A lead-in phase IB was performed. Pts, stratified by KPS (80 v 90/100), and disease status (newly diagnosed/recurrent), were randomized to V (150 mg PO daily) or P. For pts on P, cross-over was allowed at progression. Assuming a mPFS of 3.5 months for GP and 5.7 months for GV (HR=0.61), a sample size of 106 subjects (53 per group) provided 85% power to detect this difference, using a one-sided test at the 0.10 significance level. Results: No safety issues were identified in 7 pts enrolled in the phase IB study. The phase II study enrolled 106 evaluable pts (V/P 53/53) at 13 sites 2/10-6/12. Pt characteristics: median age 65/64 (range 52-82/39-83); KPS (% pts) 80: 38/30; 90: 26/38; 100: 36/32; newly diagnosed 91%/91%; recurrent: 9%/9%. Grade 3/4 toxicity (V/P, % pts, >5% in either arm): neutropenia 32/28; lymphopenia 4/15; thrombocytopenia 9/11; anemia 9/23; hyponatremia 4/15; fatigue 13/8; hyperglycemia 23/19; elevated ALT 13/9; hyperbilirubinemia 11/6; nausea 11/11. Response (%): CR 0/2, PR 8/11, SD 51/38. mPFS: 4.0/2.5 mo (95% CI: 2.5-5.3/1.9-3.8; HR 0.81 [0.54-1.21], p=0.30). 22 pts (42%) on GP crossed over to GV at progression. mOS: 6.9/6.1 mo (95% CI:5.8-8.0/5.0-8.0, HR 1.04, [0.69-1.58], p=0.84). Updated laboratory/radiological correlatives will be presented. Conclusions: Toxicity between the groups was similar. The addition of V to G in an unselected cohort does not improve response, PFS, or OS in pts with metastatic PC. Funding NCI N01-CM-62201. Clinical trial information: NCT01064622.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis