International consensus on ANA patterns (ICAP): the bumpy road towards a consensus on reporting ANA results

Jan Damoiseaux(Maastricht University), Carlos Alberto von Mühlen(Brazilian Computer Society), Ignacio Garcı́a-De La Torre(Universidad de Guadalajara), Orlando Gabriel Carballo(El Hospital General de Agudos Carlos G. Durand), Wilson de Melo Cruvinel(Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Goiás), Paulo Luiz Carvalho Francescantônio(Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Goiás), Marvin J. Fritzler(University of Calgary), Manfred Herold(Universität Innsbruck), Tsuneyo Mimori(Kyoto University), Minoru Satoh(University of Occupational and Environmental Health Japan), Luís Eduardo Coelho Andrade(Universidade Federal de São Paulo), Edward K. L. Chan(University of Florida), Karsten Conrad(TU Dresden)
Autoimmunity Highlights
January 29, 2016
Cited by 154Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

The International Consensus on ANA Patterns (ICAP) was initiated as a workshop aiming to thoroughly discuss and achieve consensus regarding the morphological patterns observed in the indirect immunofluorescence assay on HEp-2 cells. One of the topics discussed at the second ICAP workshop, and addressed in this paper, was the harmonization of reporting ANA test results. This discussion centered on the issue if cytoplasmic and mitotic patterns should be reported as positive or negative. This report outlines the issues that impact on two major different reporting methods. Although it was appreciated by all participants that cytoplasmic and mitotic patterns are clinically relevant, implications for existing diagnostic/classification criteria for ANA-associated diseases in particular hampered a final consensus on this topic. Evidently, a more concerted action of all relevant stakeholders is required. Future ICAP workshops may help to facilitate this action.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis