Elafibranor, an Agonist of the Peroxisome Proliferator−Activated Receptor−α and −δ, Induces Resolution of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Without Fibrosis Worsening

Vlad Ratziu(Inserm), Stephen A. Harrison(Brooke Army Medical Center), Sven Francque(University of Antwerp), Pierre Bédossa(Université Paris Cité), Philippe Lehert(The University of Melbourne), Lawrence Serfaty(Sorbonne Université), Manuel Romero‐Gómez(Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas), Jérôme Boursier(Université Nantes Angers Le Mans), Manal F. Abdelmalek(Duke University), Steve Caldwell(University of Virginia), Joost P.H. Drenth(Radboud University Nijmegen), Quentin M. Anstee(Newcastle University), Dean W. Hum(Genfit (France)), Rémy Hanf(Genfit (France)), A. Roudot(Genfit (France)), S. Megnien(Genfit (France)), Bart Staels(Inserm), Arun J. Sanyal(Virginia Commonwealth University), Philippe Mathurin, Jérôme Gournay(Radboud University Nijmegen), Éric Nguyen-Khac(Université de Lille), Victor de Lédinghen, Dominique Larrey, Albert Tran, Marc Bourlière(Genfit (France)), M. Maynard-Muet(Genfit (France)), Tarik Asselah(Université de Lille), Jean Henrion(Radboud University Nijmegen), Frederik Nevens(Genfit (France)), David Cassiman, Anja Geerts, Christophe Moreno(Genfit (France)), Ulrich Beuers, Peter R. Galle, U. Spengler(Virginia Commonwealth University), Elisabetta Bugianesi(Université de Lille), Antonio Craxı̀, M. Angélico(Genfit (France)), Silvia Fargion(Virginia Commonwealth University), M Voiculescu(Genfit (France)), Liliana Gheorghe(Virginia Commonwealth University), Liliana Preoțescu(Virginia Commonwealth University), Juan Caballería(Radboud University Nijmegen), Raúl J. Andrade, Javier Crespo(Radboud University Nijmegen), J.L. Callera, Aftab Ala(Duke University), Guruprasad P. Aithal, George Abouda, Velimir A. Luketic, Mao-Yu Huang(Newcastle University), Stuart C. Gordon(Virginia Commonwealth University), Paul J. Pockros, Fred Poordad(Genfit (France)), Nathan J. Shores(Virginia Commonwealth University), Martin Moehlen, Kiran Bambha(Duke University), Virginia Clark, Sanjaya K. Satapathy(Virginia Commonwealth University), Samir Parekh(Virginia Commonwealth University), R.K. Reddy, Muhammad Y. Sheikh(Genfit (France)), Gyöngyi Szabó, John M. Vierling(Radboud University Nijmegen), Timothy E. Foster(Université de Lille), Guillermo E. Umpierrez, Chih‐Jen Chang(Genfit (France)), Terry Box(Université de Lille), Juan F. Gallegos‐Orozco(Radboud University Nijmegen)
Gastroenterology
February 11, 2016
Cited by 1,012Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Background & AimsElafibranor is an agonist of the peroxisome proliferator−activated receptor-α and peroxisome proliferator−activated receptor-δ. Elafibranor improves insulin sensitivity, glucose homeostasis, and lipid metabolism and reduces inflammation. We assessed the safety and efficacy of elafibranor in an international, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial of patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH).MethodsPatients with NASH without cirrhosis were randomly assigned to groups given elafibranor 80 mg (n = 93), elafibranor 120 mg (n = 91), or placebo (n = 92) each day for 52 weeks at sites in Europe and the United States. Clinical and laboratory evaluations were performed every 2 months during this 1-year period. Liver biopsies were then collected and patients were assessed 3 months later. The primary outcome was resolution of NASH without fibrosis worsening, using protocol-defined and modified definitions. Data from the groups given the different doses of elafibranor were compared with those from the placebo group using step-down logistic regression, adjusting for baseline nonalcoholic fatty liver disease activity score.ResultsIn intention-to-treat analysis, there was no significant difference between the elafibranor and placebo groups in the protocol-defined primary outcome. However, NASH resolved without fibrosis worsening in a higher proportion of patients in the 120-mg elafibranor group vs the placebo group (19% vs 12%; odds ratio = 2.31; 95% confidence interval: 1.02−5.24; P = .045), based on a post-hoc analysis for the modified definition. In post-hoc analyses of patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease activity score ≥4 (n = 234), elafibranor 120 mg resolved NASH in larger proportions of patients than placebo based on the protocol definition (20% vs 11%; odds ratio = 3.16; 95% confidence interval: 1.22−8.13; P = .018) and the modified definitions (19% vs 9%; odds ratio = 3.52; 95% confidence interval: 1.32–9.40; P = .013). Patients with NASH resolution after receiving elafibranor 120 mg had reduced liver fibrosis stages compared with those without NASH resolution (mean reduction of 0.65 ± 0.61 in responders for the primary outcome vs an increase of 0.10 ± 0.98 in nonresponders; P < .001). Liver enzymes, lipids, glucose profiles, and markers of systemic inflammation were significantly reduced in the elafibranor 120-mg group vs the placebo group. Elafibranor was well tolerated and did not cause weight gain or cardiac events, but did produce a mild, reversible increase in serum creatinine (effect size vs placebo: increase of 4.31 ± 1.19 μmol/L; P < .001).ConclusionsA post-hoc analysis of data from trial of patients with NASH showed that elafibranor (120 mg/d for 1 year) resolved NASH without fibrosis worsening, based on a modified definition, in the intention-to-treat analysis and in patients with moderate or severe NASH. However, the predefined end point was not met in the intention to treat population. Elafibranor was well tolerated and improved patients’ cardiometabolic risk profile. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT01694849. Elafibranor is an agonist of the peroxisome proliferator−activated receptor-α and peroxisome proliferator−activated receptor-δ. Elafibranor improves insulin sensitivity, glucose homeostasis, and lipid metabolism and reduces inflammation. We assessed the safety and efficacy of elafibranor in an international, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial of patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Patients with NASH without cirrhosis were randomly assigned to groups given elafibranor 80 mg (n = 93), elafibranor 120 mg (n = 91), or placebo (n = 92) each day for 52 weeks at sites in Europe and the United States. Clinical and laboratory evaluations were performed every 2 months during this 1-year period. Liver biopsies were then collected and patients were assessed 3 months later. The primary outcome was resolution of NASH without fibrosis worsening, using protocol-defined and modified definitions. Data from the groups given the different doses of elafibranor were compared with those from the placebo group using step-down logistic regression, adjusting for baseline nonalcoholic fatty liver disease activity score. In intention-to-treat analysis, there was no significant difference between the elafibranor and placebo groups in the protocol-defined primary outcome. However, NASH resolved without fibrosis worsening in a higher proportion of patients in the 120-mg elafibranor group vs the placebo group (19% vs 12%; odds ratio = 2.31; 95% confidence interval: 1.02−5.24; P = .045), based on a post-hoc analysis for the modified definition. In post-hoc analyses of patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease activity score ≥4 (n = 234), elafibranor 120 mg resolved NASH in larger proportions of patients than placebo based on the protocol definition (20% vs 11%; odds ratio = 3.16; 95% confidence interval: 1.22−8.13; P = .018) and the modified definitions (19% vs 9%; odds ratio = 3.52; 95% confidence interval: 1.32–9.40; P = .013). Patients with NASH resolution after receiving elafibranor 120 mg had reduced liver fibrosis stages compared with those without NASH resolution (mean reduction of 0.65 ± 0.61 in responders for the primary outcome vs an increase of 0.10 ± 0.98 in nonresponders; P < .001). Liver enzymes, lipids, glucose profiles, and markers of systemic inflammation were significantly reduced in the elafibranor 120-mg group vs the placebo group. Elafibranor was well tolerated and did not cause weight gain or cardiac events, but did produce a mild, reversible increase in serum creatinine (effect size vs placebo: increase of 4.31 ± 1.19 μmol/L; P < .001). A post-hoc analysis of data from trial of patients with NASH showed that elafibranor (120 mg/d for 1 year) resolved NASH without fibrosis worsening, based on a modified definition, in the intention-to-treat analysis and in patients with moderate or severe NASH. However, the predefined end point was not met in the intention to treat population. Elafibranor was well tolerated and improved patients’ cardiometabolic risk profile. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT01694849.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis