American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guideline Recommendations for Immunohistochemical Testing of Estrogen and Progesterone Receptors in Breast Cancer

M. Elizabeth H. Hammond(Intermountain Healthcare), Daniel F. Hayes(University of Michigan), Mitch Dowsett(Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust), D. Craig Allred(The Ohio State University), Karen L. Hagerty(SouthCoast Health), Sunil Badve(Indiana University Bloomington), Patrick L. Fitzgibbons(St. Jude Medical Center), Glenn Francis(The University of Queensland), Neil S. Goldstein, Malcolm Hayes(Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre), David Hicks(University of Rochester), Susan C. Lester(Harvard University Press), Richard R. Love(University of Rochester), Pamela B. Mangu(American Society of Clinical Oncology), Lisa M. McShane(National Institutes of Health), Keith Miller(Harvard University Press), C. Kent Osborne(Baylor College of Medicine), Soonmyung Paik(Sungkyunkwan University), Jane Perlmutter(Capgemini (Netherlands)), Anthony Rhodes(University of the West of England), Hironobu Sasano(Tohoku University), Jared N. Schwartz(Presbyterian Healthcare Services), Fred C.G.J. Sweep(Radboud University Nijmegen), Sheila E. Taube, Emina Torlakovic(University of Toronto), Paul N. Valenstein(Trinity Health Michigan), Giuseppe Viale(European Institute of Oncology), Daniel Visscher(Mayo Clinic in Arizona), Thomas M. Wheeler(University of Washington), Roger Williams(MedStar Union Memorial Hospital), James L. Wittliff(The University of Texas at Austin), Antonio C. Wolff(Johns Hopkins University)
Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine
June 1, 2010
Cited by 894

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop a guideline to improve the accuracy of immunohistochemical (IHC) estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) testing in breast cancer and the utility of these receptors as predictive markers. METHODS: The American Society of Clinical Oncology and the College of American Pathologists convened an international Expert Panel that conducted a systematic review and evaluation of the literature in partnership with Cancer Care Ontario and developed recommendations for optimal IHC ER/PgR testing performance. RESULTS: Up to 20% of current IHC determinations of ER and PgR testing worldwide may be inaccurate (false negative or false positive). Most of the issues with testing have occurred because of variation in pre-analytic variables, thresholds for positivity, and interpretation criteria. RECOMMENDATIONS: The Panel recommends that ER and PgR status be determined on all invasive breast cancers and breast cancer recurrences. A testing algorithm that relies on accurate, reproducible assay performance is proposed. Elements to reliably reduce assay variation are specified. It is recommended that ER and PgR assays be considered positive if there are at least 1% positive tumor nuclei in the sample on testing in the presence of expected reactivity of internal (normal epithelial elements) and external controls. The absence of benefit from endocrine therapy for women with ER-negative invasive breast cancers has been confirmed in large overviews of randomized clinical trials.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis