Cetuximab and Radiotherapy Versus Cisplatin and Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer: A Randomized Phase II Trial

Stefano Maria Magrini(Regione Puglia), Michela Buglione(Regione Puglia), Renzo Corvò(Regione Puglia), Luigi Pirtoli(Regione Puglia), Fabiola Paiar(Regione Puglia), Pietro Ponticelli(Regione Puglia), Alessia Petrucci(Regione Puglia), Almalina Bacigalupo(Regione Puglia), Monica Crociani(Regione Puglia), Luciana Lastrucci(Regione Puglia), Stefania Vecchio(Regione Puglia), Pierluigi Bonomo(Regione Puglia), Nadia Pasinetti(Regione Puglia), Luca Triggiani(Regione Puglia), R. Cavagnini(Regione Puglia), Loredana Costa(Regione Puglia), Sandro Tonoli(Regione Puglia), Marta Maddalo(Regione Puglia), Salvatore Grisanti(Regione Puglia)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
December 8, 2015
Cited by 218Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

PURPOSE: No randomized trials have been conducted to directly compare radiotherapy (RT) with concomitant cisplatin (CDDP) versus concomitant cetuximab (CTX) as first-line treatment of locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. In this randomized trial, we compared these two treatment regimens in terms of compliance, toxicity, and efficacy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either CDDP 40 mg/m(2) once per week or CTX 400 mg/m(2) as loading dose followed by CTX 250 mg/m(2) once per week concomitant to radical RT. For primary end points, compliance to treatment was defined as number of days of treatment discontinuation and drug dosage reduction. The acute toxicity rate was defined according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria. Efficacy end points were local recurrence-free survival, metastasis-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival. RESULTS: The study was discontinued early because of slow accrual after the enrollment of 70 patients. RT discontinuation for more than 10 days occurred in 13% of patients given CTX and 0% given CDDP (P = .05). Drug dosage reduction occurred in 34% given CTX and 53% given CDDP (difference not significant). Toxicity profiles differed between the two arms, with hematologic, renal, and GI toxicities more frequent in the CDDP arm, and cutaneous toxicity and the need for nutritional support more frequent in the CTX arm. Serious adverse events related to treatment, including four versus one toxic deaths, were higher in the CTX arm (19% v 3%, P = .044). Locoregional control, patterns of failure, and survivals were similar between the treatment arms. CONCLUSION: CTX concomitant to RT lowered compliance and increased acute toxicity rates. Efficacy outcomes were similar in both arms. These results raise the issue of appropriately selecting patients with head and neck cancer who can benefit from CTX in combination with RT.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis