Lapatinib in Combination With Capecitabine Plus Oxaliplatin in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Positive Advanced or Metastatic Gastric, Esophageal, or Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma: TRIO-013/LOGiC—A Randomized Phase III Trial

J. Randolph Hecht(Yonsei University), Yung‐Jue Bang(Yonsei University), Shukui Qin(Yonsei University), Hyun Cheol Chung(Yonsei University), Jianming Xu(Yonsei University), Joon Oh Park(Yonsei University), Krzysztof Jeziorski(Yonsei University), Yaroslav Shparyk(Yonsei University), Paulo M. Hoff(Yonsei University), Alberto Sobrero(Yonsei University), Pamela Salman(Yonsei University), Jin Li(Yonsei University), Светлана Проценко(Yonsei University), Zev A. Wainberg(Yonsei University), Marc Buyse(Yonsei University), Karen Afenjar(Yonsei University), Vincent Houé(Yonsei University), Agathe Garcia(Yonsei University), Tomomi Kaneko(Yonsei University), Yingjie Huang(Yonsei University), S. Khan‐Wasti(Yonsei University), Sergio Santillana(Yonsei University), Michael F. Press(Yonsei University), Dennis J. Slamon(Yonsei University)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
December 1, 2015
Cited by 620Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of adding lapatinib to capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CapeOx) in patients with previously untreated human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) -amplified advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with HER2-positive advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma were randomly assigned at a one-to-one ratio to CapeOx plus lapatinib 1,250 mg or placebo daily. Primary end point was overall survival (OS) in patients with centrally confirmed HER2 amplification in the primary efficacy population. RESULTS: A total of 545 patients were randomly assigned, and 487 patients comprised the primary efficacy population. Median OS in the lapatinib and placebo arms was 12.2 (95% CI, 10.6 to 14.2) and 10.5 months (95% CI, 9.0 to 11.3), respectively, which was not significantly different (hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.12). Median progression-free survival in the lapatinib and placebo arms was 6.0 (95% CI, 5.6 to 7.0) and 5.4 months (95% CI, 4.4 to 5.7), respectively (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.00; P = .0381). Response rate was significantly higher in the lapatinib arm: 53% (95% CI, 46.4 to 58.8) compared with 39% (95% CI, 32.9 to 45.3) in the placebo arm (P = .0031). Preplanned exploratory subgroup analyses showed OS in the lapatinib arm was prolonged in Asian and younger patients. No correlation was observed between HER2 immunohistochemistry status and survival. There were increased toxicities in the lapatinib arm, particularly diarrhea. CONCLUSION: Addition of lapatinib to CapeOx did not increase OS in patients with HER2-amplified gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. There were clear differences in the effect of lapatinib depending on region and age. Future studies could examine this correlation.


Related Papers