Typical investigational medicinal products follow relatively uniform regulations in 10 European Clinical Research Infrastructures Network (ECRIN) countries

Christian Gluud(Copenhagen University Hospital), Christine Kubiak(Inserm), Kate Whitfield(Copenhagen University Hospital), Jane Byrne(Wythenshawe Hospital), Karl‐Heinz Huemer(Medical University of Vienna), Steffen Thirstrup(Danish Medicines Agency), Christian Libersa(Inserm), Béatrice Barraud(Inserm), Xina Grählert(University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus), G. Dreier(University Medical Center Freiburg), Sebastian Geismann(University Medical Center Freiburg), Wolfgang Kuchinke(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Zsuza Temesvari(Ministry of Health), Gyorgy Blasko(Ministry of Health), Gabriella Kardos(Ministry of Health), Timothy O’Brien(Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway), Margaret Cooney(European Clinical Research Infrastructure Network), Siobhán Gaynor(European Clinical Research Infrastructure Network), Arrigo Schieppati(Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research), Fernando de Andrés(Universidad Complutense de Madrid), Nuria Sanz(Spanish Clinical Research Network), Germán Kreis(Spanish Clinical Research Network), Charlotte Asker-Hagelberg, Hanna Johansson, Sue Bourne(United Kingdom Clinical Research Collaboration), Adeeba Asghar(NIHR Research Delivery Network), Jean‐Marc Husson(European Forum for Good Clinical Practice), Jacques Demotes‐Mainard(Inserm)
Trials
March 27, 2012
Cited by 10Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In order to facilitate multinational clinical research, regulatory requirements need to become international and harmonised. The EU introduced the Directive 2001/20/EC in 2004, regulating investigational medicinal products in Europe. METHODS: We conducted a survey in order to identify the national regulatory requirements for major categories of clinical research in ten European Clinical Research Infrastructures Network (ECRIN) countries-Austria, Denmark, France, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Spain, Sweden, and United Kingdom-covering approximately 70% of the EU population. Here we describe the results for regulatory requirements for typical investigational medicinal products, in the ten countries. RESULTS: Our results show that the ten countries have fairly harmonised definitions of typical investigational medicinal products. Clinical trials assessing typical investigational medicinal products require authorisation from a national competent authority in each of the countries surveyed. The opinion of the competent authorities is communicated to the trial sponsor within the same timelines, i.e., no more than 60 days, in all ten countries. The authority to which the application has to be sent to in the different countries is not fully harmonised. CONCLUSION: The Directive 2001/20/EC defined the term 'investigational medicinal product' and all regulatory requirements described therein are applicable to investigational medicinal products. Our survey showed, however, that those requirements had been adopted in ten European countries, not for investigational medicinal products overall, but rather a narrower category which we term 'typical' investigational medicinal products. The result is partial EU harmonisation of requirements and a relatively navigable landscape for the sponsor regarding typical investigational medicinal products.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis