Adjuvant Ovarian Suppression in Premenopausal Breast Cancer

Prudence A. Francis(St Vincent's Hospital), Meredith M. Regan(Dana-Farber Cancer Institute), Gini F. Fleming(University of Chicago Medical Center), István Láng(National Institute of Oncology), Eva Ciruelos(Solti), Meritxell Bellet(Hebron University), Hervé Bonnefoi(Université de Bordeaux), Miguel Ángel Climent(Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología), Gian Antonio Da Prada(Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri), Harold J. Burstein(Dana-Farber Cancer Institute), Silvana Martino(Angeles Clinic and Research Institute), Nancy E. Davidson(ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group), Charles E. Geyer, Barbara Walley(Ontario Institute for Cancer Research), Robert E. Coleman(National Cancer Research Institute), Pierre Kerbrat(European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer), Stefan Buchholz, James N. Ingle(University of Pittsburgh Medical Center), Eric P. Winer(Dana-Farber Cancer Institute), Manuela Rabaglio(University of Pittsburgh Medical Center), Rudolf Maibach(International Breast Cancer Study Group), Barbara Ruepp(International Breast Cancer Study Group), Anita Giobbie‐Hurder(Dana-Farber Cancer Institute), Karen N. Price(Frontier Science & Technology Research Foundation), Marco Colleoni(European Institute of Oncology), Giuseppe Viale(University of Milan), Alan S. Coates(Breast Cancer Trials), Aron Goldhirsch(European Institute of Oncology), Richard D. Gelber(Frontier Science & Technology Research Foundation)
New England Journal of Medicine
December 11, 2014
Cited by 726Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Suppression of ovarian estrogen production reduces the recurrence of hormone-receptor-positive early breast cancer in premenopausal women, but its value when added to tamoxifen is uncertain. METHODS: We randomly assigned 3066 premenopausal women, stratified according to prior receipt or nonreceipt of chemotherapy, to receive 5 years of tamoxifen, tamoxifen plus ovarian suppression, or exemestane plus ovarian suppression. The primary analysis tested the hypothesis that tamoxifen plus ovarian suppression would improve disease-free survival, as compared with tamoxifen alone. In the primary analysis, 46.7% of the patients had not received chemotherapy previously, and 53.3% had received chemotherapy and remained premenopausal. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 67 months, the estimated disease-free survival rate at 5 years was 86.6% in the tamoxifen-ovarian suppression group and 84.7% in the tamoxifen group (hazard ratio for disease recurrence, second invasive cancer, or death, 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66 to 1.04; P=0.10). Multivariable allowance for prognostic factors suggested a greater treatment effect with tamoxifen plus ovarian suppression than with tamoxifen alone (hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.98). Most recurrences occurred in patients who had received prior chemotherapy, among whom the rate of freedom from breast cancer at 5 years was 82.5% in the tamoxifen-ovarian suppression group and 78.0% in the tamoxifen group (hazard ratio for recurrence, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.60 to 1.02). At 5 years, the rate of freedom from breast cancer was 85.7% in the exemestane-ovarian suppression group (hazard ratio for recurrence vs. tamoxifen, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.87). CONCLUSIONS: Adding ovarian suppression to tamoxifen did not provide a significant benefit in the overall study population. However, for women who were at sufficient risk for recurrence to warrant adjuvant chemotherapy and who remained premenopausal, the addition of ovarian suppression improved disease outcomes. Further improvement was seen with the use of exemestane plus ovarian suppression. (Funded by Pfizer and others; SOFT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00066690.).


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis