The Behavior Change Technique Taxonomy (v1) of 93 Hierarchically Clustered Techniques: Building an International Consensus for the Reporting of Behavior Change Interventions

Susan Michie(Department of Health and Social Care), Michelle Richardson(University of Exeter), Marie Johnston(University of Aberdeen), Charles Abraham(University of Aberdeen), Jill Francis(City, University of London), Wendy Hardeman(University of Cambridge), Martin Eccles(MRC Biostatistics Unit), James E. Cane(University of Kent), Caroline E Wood(University of Aberdeen)
Annals of Behavioral Medicine
March 19, 2013
Cited by 7,960Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: CONSORT guidelines call for precise reporting of behavior change interventions: we need rigorous methods of characterizing active content of interventions with precision and specificity. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to develop an extensive, consensually agreed hierarchically structured taxonomy of techniques [behavior change techniques (BCTs)] used in behavior change interventions. METHODS: In a Delphi-type exercise, 14 experts rated labels and definitions of 124 BCTs from six published classification systems. Another 18 experts grouped BCTs according to similarity of active ingredients in an open-sort task. Inter-rater agreement amongst six researchers coding 85 intervention descriptions by BCTs was assessed. RESULTS: This resulted in 93 BCTs clustered into 16 groups. Of the 26 BCTs occurring at least five times, 23 had adjusted kappas of 0.60 or above. CONCLUSIONS: "BCT taxonomy v1," an extensive taxonomy of 93 consensually agreed, distinct BCTs, offers a step change as a method for specifying interventions, but we anticipate further development and evaluation based on international, interdisciplinary consensus.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis