Disease-Free Survival as a Surrogate for Overall Survival in Adjuvant Trials of Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Koji Oba(Mayo Clinic in Arizona), Xavier Paolettí(Tokai Central Hospital), Steven Alberts(Institut Curie), Yung‐Jue Bang(Yokohama City University), Jacqueline Benedetti(Dana-Farber Cancer Institute), Harry Bleiberg(Seoul National University Hospital), Paul J. Catalano(Seoul National University Hospital), Florian Lordick(Institut Curie), Stefan Michiels(Tokai Central Hospital), Satoshi Morita(Mayo Clinic in Arizona), Yasuo Ohashi(Leipzig University), Jean‐Pierre Pignon(Université Paris-Saclay), Philippe Rougier(Dana-Farber Cancer Institute), Mitsuru Sasako(Institut Curie), Junichi Sakamoto(Dana-Farber Cancer Institute), Daniel J. Sargent(Institut Curie), Kohei Shitara(National Cancer Center Hospital East), Eric Van Cutsem(Hyogo Medical University), Marc Buyse(The University of Tokyo), Tomasz Burzykowski(International Drug Development Institute (Belgium))
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
October 9, 2013
Cited by 174Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In investigations of the effectiveness of surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancers, overall survival (OS) is considered the gold standard endpoint. However, the disadvantage of using OS as the endpoint is that it requires an extended follow-up period. We sought to investigate whether disease-free survival (DFS) is a valid surrogate for OS in trials of adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer. METHODS: The GASTRIC group initiated a meta-analysis of individual patient data collected in randomized clinical trials comparing adjuvant chemotherapy vs surgery alone for patients with curatively resected gastric cancer. Surrogacy of DFS was assessed through the correlation between the endpoints as well as through the correlation between the treatment effects on the endpoints. External validation of the prediction based on DFS was also evaluated. RESULTS: Individual patient data from 14 randomized clinical trials that included a total of 3288 patients were analyzed. The rank correlation coefficient between DFS and OS was 0.974 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.971 to 0.976). The coefficient of determination between the treatment effects on DFS and on OS was as high as 0.964 (95% CI = 0.926 to 1.000), and the surrogate threshold effect based on adjusted regression analysis was 0.92. In external validation, the six hazard ratios for OS predicted according to DFS were in very good agreement with those actually observed for OS. CONCLUSIONS: DFS is an acceptable surrogate for OS in trials of cytotoxic agents for gastric cancer in the adjuvant setting.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis