Survival in BRAF V600–Mutant Advanced Melanoma Treated with Vemurafenib

Jeffrey A. Sosman(Breast Cancer Research Foundation), Kevin B. Kim(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Lynn M. Schuchter(University of Pennsylvania), René González(University of Colorado Denver), Anna C. Pavlick(Columbia University Irving Medical Center), Jeffrey S. Weber(Moffitt Cancer Center), Grant A. McArthur(Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre), Thomas E. Hutson(Texas Oncology), Stergios J. Moschos(University of Pittsburgh), Keith T. Flaherty(Massachusetts General Hospital), Peter Hersey(University of Newcastle Australia), Richard Kefford(Melanoma Institute Australia), Donald P. Lawrence(Massachusetts General Hospital), Igor Puzanov(Breast Cancer Research Foundation), Karl D. Lewis(University of Colorado Denver), Ravi K. Amaravadi(University of Pennsylvania), Bartosz Chmielowski(University of California, Los Angeles), H. Jeffrey Lawrence(Roche (Switzerland)), Yu Shyr(Vanderbilt University Medical Center), Fei Ye(Vanderbilt University Medical Center), Jiang Li(La Roche College), K. B. Nolop, Richard J. Lee(La Roche College), Andrew K. Joe(La Roche College), Antoni Ribas(University of California, Los Angeles)
New England Journal of Medicine
February 22, 2012
Cited by 2,147Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Approximately 50% of melanomas harbor activating (V600) mutations in the serine-threonine protein kinase B-RAF (BRAF). The oral BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib (PLX4032) frequently produced tumor regressions in patients with BRAF V600-mutant metastatic melanoma in a phase 1 trial and improved overall survival in a phase 3 trial. METHODS: We designed a multicenter phase 2 trial of vemurafenib in patients with previously treated BRAF V600-mutant metastatic melanoma to investigate the efficacy of vemurafenib with respect to overall response rate (percentage of treated patients with a tumor response), duration of response, and overall survival. The primary end point was the overall response rate as ascertained by the independent review committee; overall survival was a secondary end point. RESULTS: A total of 132 patients had a median follow-up of 12.9 months (range, 0.6 to 20.1). The confirmed overall response rate was 53% (95% confidence interval [CI], 44 to 62; 6% with a complete response and 47% with a partial response), the median duration of response was 6.7 months (95% CI, 5.6 to 8.6), and the median progression-free survival was 6.8 months (95% CI, 5.6 to 8.1). Primary progression was observed in only 14% of patients. Some patients had a response after receiving vemurafenib for more than 6 months. The median overall survival was 15.9 months (95% CI, 11.6 to 18.3). The most common adverse events were grade 1 or 2 arthralgia, rash, photosensitivity, fatigue, and alopecia. Cutaneous squamous-cell carcinomas (the majority, keratoacanthoma type) were diagnosed in 26% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Vemurafenib induces clinical responses in more than half of patients with previously treated BRAF V600-mutant metastatic melanoma. In this study with a long follow-up, the median overall survival was approximately 16 months. (Funded by Hoffmann-La Roche; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00949702.).


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis