Effect of Body Mass Index on Outcomes of Peritoneal Dialysis Patients in India

Narayan Prasad(Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences), Archana Sinha(Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences), Amit Gupta(Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences), Raj Kumar Sharma(Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences), Dharmendra Bhadauria(Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences), Abhilash Chandra(Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences), Kashi Nath Prasad(Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences), Anupama Kaul(Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences)
Peritoneal Dialysis International
March 1, 2014
Cited by 53Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We studied the effect of body mass index (BMI) at peritoneal dialysis (PD) initiation on patient and technique survival and on peritonitis during follow-up. METHODS: We followed 328 incident patients on PD (176 with diabetes; 242 men; mean age: 52.6 ± 12.6 years; mean BMI: 21.9 ± 3.8 kg/m(2)) for 20.0 ± 14.3 months. Patients were categorized into four BMI groups: obese, ≥ 25 kg/m(2); overweight, 23 - 24.9 kg/m(2); normal, 18.5 - 22.9 kg/m(2) (reference category); and underweight, <18.5 kg/m(2). The outcomes of interest were compared between the groups. RESULTS: Of the 328 patients, 47 (14.3%) were underweight, 171 (52.1%) were normal weight, 53 (16.2%) were overweight, and 57 (17.4%) were obese at commencement of PD therapy. The crude hazard ratio (HR) for mortality (p = 0.004) and the HR adjusted for age, subjective global assessment, comorbidities, albumin, diabetes, and residual glomerular filtration rate (p = 0.02) were both significantly greater in the underweight group than in the normal-weight group. In comparison with the reference category, the HR for mortality was significantly greater for underweight PD patients with diabetes [2.7; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.5 to 5.0; p = 0.002], but similar for all BMI categories of nondiabetic PD patients. Median patient survival was statistically inferior in underweight patients than in patients having a normal BMI. Median patient survival in underweight, normal, overweight, and obese patients was, respectively, 26 patient-months (95% CI: 20.9 to 31.0 patient-months), 50 patient-months (95% CI: 33.6 to 66.4 patient-months), 57.7 patient-months (95% CI: 33.2 to 82.2 patient-months), and 49 patient-months (95% CI: 18.4 to 79.6 patient-months; p = 0.015). Death-censored technique survival was statistically similar in all BMI categories. In comparison with the reference category, the odds ratio for peritonitis occurrence was 1.8 (95% CI: 0.9 to 3.4; p = 0.086) for underweight patients; 1.7 (95% CI: 0.9 to 3.2; p = 0.091) for overweight patients; and 3.4 (95% CI: 1.8 to 6.4; p < 0.001) for obese patients. CONCLUSIONS: In our PD patients, mean BMI was within the normal range. The HR for mortality was significantly greater for underweight diabetic PD patients than for patients in the reference category. Death-censored technique survival was similar in all BMI categories. Obese patients had a greater risk of peritonitis.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis