Randomized Phase II Trial of Gemcitabine Plus TH-302 Versus Gemcitabine in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

Mitesh J. Borad(Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport), Shantan Reddy(Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport), Nathan Bahary(Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport), Hope E. Uronis(Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport), Darren Sigal(Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport), Allen Lee Cohn(Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport), William R. Schelman(Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport), Joe Stephenson(Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport), E. Gabriela Chiorean(Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport), Peter J. Rosen(Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport), Brian Ulrich(Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport), Tomislav Dragovich(Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport), Salvatore A. Del Prete(Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport), Mark U. Rarick(Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport), Clarence Eng(Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport), Stew Kroll(Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport), David P. Ryan(Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
December 16, 2014
Cited by 189Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

PURPOSE: TH-302 is an investigational hypoxia-activated prodrug that releases the DNA alkylator bromo-isophosphoramide mustard in hypoxic settings. This phase II study (NCT01144455) evaluated gemcitabine plus TH-302 in patients with previously untreated, locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m(2)), gemcitabine plus TH-302 240 mg/m(2) (G+T240), or gemcitabine plus TH-302 340 mg/m(2) (G+T340). Randomized crossover after progression on gemcitabine was allowed. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included overall survival (OS), tumor response, CA 19-9 response, and safety. RESULTS: Two hundred fourteen patients (77% with metastatic disease) were enrolled between June 2010 and July 2011. PFS was significantly longer with gemcitabine plus TH-302 (pooled combination arms) compared with gemcitabine alone (median PFS, 5.6 v 3.6 months, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.87; P = .005; median PFS for metastatic disease, 5.1 v 3.4 months, respectively). Median PFS times for G+T240 and G+T340 were 5.6 and 6.0 months, respectively. Tumor response was 12%, 17%, and 26% in the gemcitabine, G+T240, and G+T340 arms, respectively (G+T340 v gemcitabine, P = .04). CA 19-9 decrease was greater with G+T340 versus gemcitabine (-5,398 v -549 U/mL, respectively; P = .008). Median OS times for gemcitabine, G+T240, and G+T340 were 6.9, 8.7, and 9.2 months, respectively (P = not significant). The most common adverse events (AEs) were fatigue, nausea, and peripheral edema (frequencies similar across arms). Skin and mucosal toxicities (2% grade 3) and myelosuppression (55% grade 3 or 4) were the most common TH-302-related AEs but were not associated with treatment discontinuation. CONCLUSION: PFS, tumor response, and CA 19-9 response were significantly improved with G+TH-302. G+T340 is being investigated further in the phase III MAESTRO study (NCT01746979).


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis