Laparotomy versus Peritoneal Drainage for Necrotizing Enterocolitis and Perforation

Richard L. Moss(University of Alabama), Reed A. Dimmitt(University of Alabama at Birmingham), Douglas C. Barnhart(University of Alabama at Birmingham), Karl G. Sylvester(Stanford University), Rebeccah L. Brown(Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center), David M. Powell(Children's National), Saleem Islam(University of Mississippi), Jacob C. Langer(University of Toronto), Thomas T. Sato(Children's Hospital of Wisconsin), Mary L. Brandt(Texas Children's Hospital), Hanmin Lee(University of California, San Francisco), Martin L. Blakely(University of Tennessee Health Science Center), Eric L. Lazar(Morristown Medical Center), Ronald B. Hirschl(University of Michigan), Brian D. Kenney(Nationwide Children's Hospital), David J. Hackam(University of Pittsburgh), Daniel Zelterman(Yale University), Bonnie L. Silverman(University of Alabama)
New England Journal of Medicine
May 24, 2006
Cited by 419

Abstract

Background: Perforated necrotizing enterocolitis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in premature infants, and the optimal treatment is uncertain. We designed this multicenter randomized trial to compare outcomes of primary peritoneal drainage with laparotomy and bowel resection in preterm infants with perforated necrotizing enterocolitis.Methods: We randomly assigned 117 preterm infants (delivered before 34 weeks of gestation) with birth weights less than 1500 g and perforated necrotizing enterocolitis at 15 pediatric centers to undergo primary peritoneal drainage or laparotomy with bowel resection. Postoperative care was standardized. The primary outcome was survival at 90 days postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included dependence on parenteral nutrition 90 days postoperatively and length of hospital stay.Results: At 90 days postoperatively, 19 of 55 infants assigned to primary peritoneal drainage had died (34.5 percent), as compared with 22 of 62 infants assigned to laparotomy (35.5 percent, P=0.92). The percentages of infants who depended on total parenteral nutrition were 17 of 36 (47.2 percent) in the peritoneal-drainage group and 16 of 40 (40.0 percent) in the laparotomy group (P=0.53). The mean (+/-SD) length of hospitalization for the 76 infants who were alive 90 days after operation was similar in the primary peritoneal-drainage and laparotomy groups (126+/-58 days and 116+/-56 days, respectively; P=0.43). Subgroup analyses stratified according to the presence or absence of radiographic evidence of extensive necrotizing enterocolitis (pneumatosis intestinalis), gestational age of less than 25 weeks, and serum pH less than 7.30 at presentation showed no significant advantage of either treatment in any group.Conclusions: The type of operation performed for perforated necrotizing enterocolitis does not influence survival or other clinically important early outcomes in preterm infants. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00252681.).


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis