Adherence Is the Critical Factor for Achieving Molecular Responses in Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Who Achieve Complete Cytogenetic Responses on Imatinib

David Marín(Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux), Alexandra Bazeos(Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux), François-Xavier Mahon(Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux), Lina Eliasson(Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux), Dragana Milojković(Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux), Marco Bua(Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux), Jane F. Apperley(Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux), Richard Szydlo(Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux), Ritti Desai(Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux), Kasia Kozlowski(Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux), Christos Paliompeis(Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux), Victoria Latham(Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux), Letizia Foroni(Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux), Mathiéu Molimard(Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux), Alistair Reid(Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux), Katy Rezvani(Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux), Hugues de Lavallade(Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux), Cristina Guallar(Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux), John M. Goldman(Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux), Jamshid S. Khorashad(Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
April 12, 2010
Cited by 899Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

PURPOSE: There is a considerable variability in the level of molecular responses achieved with imatinib therapy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). These differences could result from variable therapy adherence. METHODS: Eighty-seven patients with chronic-phase CML treated with imatinib 400 mg/d for a median of 59.7 months (range, 25 to 104 months) who had achieved complete cytogenetic response had adherence monitored during a 3-month period by using a microelectronic monitoring device. Adherence was correlated with levels of molecular response. Other factors that could influence outcome were also analyzed. RESULTS: Median adherence rate was 98% (range, 24% to 104%). Twenty-three patients (26.4%) had adherence <or= 90%; in 12 of these patients (14%), adherence was <or= 80%. There was a strong correlation between adherence rate (<or= 90% or > 90%) and the 6-year probability of a 3-log reduction (also known as major molecular response [MMR]) in BCR-ABL1 transcripts (28.4% v 94.5%; P < .001) and also complete molecular response (CMR; 0% v 43.8%; P = .002). Multivariate analysis identified adherence (relative risk [RR], 11.7; P = .001) and expression of the molecular human organic cation transporter-1 (RR, 1.79; P = .038) as the only independent predictors for MMR. Adherence was the only independent predictor for CMR. No molecular responses were observed when adherence was <or= 80% (P < .001). Patients whose imatinib doses were increased had poor adherence (86.4%). In this latter population, adherence was the only independent predictor for inability to achieve an MMR (RR, 17.66; P = .006). CONCLUSION: In patients with CML treated with imatinib for some years, poor adherence may be the predominant reason for inability to obtain adequate molecular responses.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis