Prospective evaluation of the conversion rate in the receptor status between primary breast cancer and metastasis: results from the GEICAM 2009-03 ConvertHER study

Eduardo Martínez de Dueñas(Fundación Hospital Provincial de Castellón), Ana Lluch Hernández(INCLIVA Health Research Institute), Ángel Guerrero Zotano(Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología), Ramón María Pérez Carrión(Clínica Girona), José Ignacio Chacón(Hospital Virgen de la Salud), Silvia Antolín(Complexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña), Ángela López Rodrí­guez(Fundación Hospital Provincial de Castellón), José Alejandro Pérez Fidalgo(INCLIVA Health Research Institute), Jaime Ferrer-Lozano(INCLIVA Health Research Institute), Octavio Burgués Gasión(INCLIVA Health Research Institute), Eva Carrasco Carrascal(GEICAM – Spanish Breast Cancer Group), Andrés Hernando Capilla(GEICAM – Spanish Breast Cancer Group), Isabel Blancas(Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada), Montserrat Muñoz-Mateu, María Helena López de Ceballos Reyna(Hospital San Pedro de Alcántara), Amparo Oltra Ferrando(Hospital Virgen de los Lirios), Noelia Martínez-Jáñez(Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal), V. Carañana Ballerini(Hospital Arnau de Vilanova), A. Antón Torres(Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet), Gustavo Catalán(Hospital Son Llatzer), José Á. García-Sáenz(Hospital Clínico San Carlos), S. Menjón(Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves), Ana M. González-Angulo(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
January 10, 2014
Cited by 68Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the conversion rate of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) between primary tumors and metastatic lesions in advanced breast cancer. Patients with suspected diagnosis of locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer, either at first relapse or after successive disease progressions, who had an appropriately preserved sample from a primary tumor and were scheduled for a biopsy of the recurrent lesion, were included. Blinded determinations of receptor status on paired samples were performed by immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization at a central laboratory and compared with those performed locally. Overall, 196 patients were included and 184 patients were considered evaluable. Reasons for non-evaluability included the inability to perform biopsy (n = 4) or biopsy results showing normal tissue (n = 3), benign disease (n = 3) or a second neoplasia (n = 2). Conversion rates determined at local level were higher than those determined centrally (HER2: 16 vs. 3 %, ER: 21 vs. 13 %, PR: 35 vs. 28 %, respectively). There was substantial agreement regarding the expression of HER2 in primary tumors and metastases, and ER at metastases, between local and central laboratories. PR at any site and ER at primary site showed moderate agreement. Oncologists altered their treatment plans in 31 % of patients whose tumor subtype had changed. These results reinforce the recommendation for performing confirmatory biopsies of metastases, not only to avoid misdiagnosis of breast cancer relapse, but also to optimize treatment (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01377363).


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis