Report of the European Myeloma Network on multiparametric flow cytometry in multiple myeloma and related disorders

Andy C. Rawstron(Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust), A. Orfao(Universidad de Salamanca), Meral Beksaç(Ankara University), Ludmila Bezdîčková(University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady), Rik A. Brooimans(Erasmus MC Cancer Institute), Horia Bumbea(Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy), Klara Dalva(Ankara University), Gwenny M. Fuhler(University Medical Center Groningen), J.W. Gratama(Erasmus MC Cancer Institute), Dirk Hose(University Hospital Heidelberg), L. Kovarova(University Hospital Brno), Michael Lioznov(Universität Hamburg), Gema Mateo(Universidad de Salamanca), Ricardo Morilla(Institute of Cancer Research), Anne K. Mylin(University of Copenhagen), Paola Omedè(University of Turin), Catherine Pellat‐Deceunynck(Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust), Michael Andres(Inserm), Maria Teresa Petrucci(Sapienza University of Rome), Marina Ruggeri(University of Turin), Grzegorz Rymkiewicz(The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology), Alexander Schmitz(Aarhus University), Martin Schreder, Caroline Seynaeve(Vrije Universiteit Brussel), Martin Špaček(University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady), Ruth M. de Tute(Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust), Els Van Valckenborgh(Vrije Universiteit Brussel), Nicola J. Weston-Bell(University of Southampton), Roger G. Owen(Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust), Jesús F. San Miguel(Universidad de Salamanca), Pieter Sonneveld(Erasmus MC), Hans Erik Johnsen(Aalborg University Hospital), on behalf of the European Myeloma Network
Haematologica
February 11, 2008
Cited by 512Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

The European Myeloma Network (EMN) organized two flow cytometry workshops. The first aimed to identify specific indications for flow cytometry in patients with monoclonal gammopathies, and consensus technical approaches through a questionnaire-based review of current practice in participating laboratories. The second aimed to resolve outstanding technical issues and develop a consensus approach to analysis of plasma cells. The primary clinical applications identified were: differential diagnosis of neoplastic plasma cell disorders from reactive plasmacytosis; identifying risk of progression in patients with MGUS and detecting minimal residual disease. A range of technical recommendations were identified, including: 1) CD38, CD138 and CD45 should all be included in at least one tube for plasma cell identification and enumeration. The primary gate should be based on CD38 vs. CD138 expression; 2) after treatment, clonality assessment is only likely to be informative when combined with immunophenotype to detect abnormal cells. Flow cytometry is suitable for demonstrating a stringent complete remission; 3) for detection of abnormal plasma cells, a minimal panel should include CD19 and CD56. A preferred panel would also include CD20, CD117, CD28 and CD27; 4) discrepancies between the percentage of plasma cells detected by flow cytometry and morphology are primarily related to sample quality and it is, therefore, important to determine that marrow elements are present in follow-up samples, particularly normal plasma cells in MRD negative cases.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis