Identification of a 24-Gene Prognostic Signature That Improves the European LeukemiaNet Risk Classification of Acute Myeloid Leukemia: An International Collaborative Study

Zejuan Li(Northwestern University), Tobias Herold(Northwestern University), Chunjiang He(Northwestern University), Peter J.M. Valk(Northwestern University), Ping Chen(Northwestern University), Vindi Jurinović(Northwestern University), Ulrich Mansmann(Northwestern University), Michael D. Radmacher(Northwestern University), Kati Maharry(Northwestern University), Miao Sun(Northwestern University), Xinan Yang(Northwestern University), Hao Huang(Northwestern University), Xi Jiang(Northwestern University), Maria‐Cristina Sauerland(Northwestern University), Thomas Büchner(Northwestern University), Wolfgang Hiddemann(Northwestern University), Abdel Elkahloun(Northwestern University), Mary Beth Neilly(Northwestern University), Yanming Zhang(Northwestern University), Richard A. Larson(Northwestern University), Michelle M. Le Beau(Northwestern University), Michael A. Caligiuri(Northwestern University), Konstanze Döhner(Northwestern University), Lars Bullinger(Northwestern University), Paul Liu(Northwestern University), Ruud Delwel(Northwestern University), Guido Marcucci(Northwestern University), Bob Löwenberg(Northwestern University), Clara D. Bloomfield(Northwestern University), Janet D. Rowley(Northwestern University), Stefan K. Bohlander(Northwestern University), Jianjun Chen(Northwestern University)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
February 5, 2013
Cited by 222Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify a robust prognostic gene expression signature as an independent predictor of survival of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and use it to improve established risk classification. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four independent sets totaling 499 patients with AML carrying various cytogenetic and molecular abnormalities were used as training sets. Two independent patient sets composed of 825 patients were used as validation sets. Notably, patients from different sets were treated with different protocols, and their gene expression profiles were derived using different microarray platforms. Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier methods were used for survival analyses. RESULTS: A prognostic signature composed of 24 genes was derived from a meta-analysis of Cox regression values of each gene across the four training sets. In multivariable models, a higher sum value of the 24-gene signature was an independent predictor of shorter overall (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) in both training and validation sets (P < .01). Moreover, this signature could substantially improve the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) risk classification of AML, and patients in three new risk groups classified by the integrated risk classification showed significantly (P < .001) distinct OS and EFS. CONCLUSION: Despite different treatment protocols applied to patients and use of different microarray platforms for expression profiling, a common prognostic gene signature was identified as an independent predictor of survival of patients with AML. The integrated risk classification incorporating this gene signature provides a better framework for risk stratification and outcome prediction than the ELN classification.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis