A Randomized Trial of Exemestane after Two to Three Years of Tamoxifen Therapy in Postmenopausal Women with Primary Breast Cancer

R. Charles Coombes(Charing Cross Hospital), Emma Hall(Institute of Cancer Research), Lorna J. Gibson(Charing Cross Hospital), Robert Paridaens(Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven), Jacek Jassem(Gdańsk Medical University), T. Delozier(Centre François Baclesse), Stephen E. Jones, Isabel Álvarez(Biogipuzkoa Health Research Institute), Gianfilippo Bertelli(Cancer Institute (WIA)), Olaf Ortmann(University of Regensburg), Alan S. Coates(University of Sydney), Emilio Bajetta(Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori), David Dodwell, Robert E. Coleman(Weston Park Cancer Centre), Lesley Fallowfield(University of Sussex), E. Mickiewicz, Jørn Andersen(Aarhus University Hospital), Per Eystein Lønning(Haukeland University Hospital), Giorgio Cocconi(University of Parma), Alan L. Stewart(The Christie Hospital), Nick Stuart(Ysbyty Gwynedd Hospital NHS Trust), Claire Snowdon(Charing Cross Hospital), M. Carpentieri(Pfizer (Italy)), Giorgio Massimini(Pfizer (Italy)), Judith M. Bliss(Institute of Cancer Research)
New England Journal of Medicine
March 10, 2004
Cited by 1,766Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tamoxifen, taken for five years, is the standard adjuvant treatment for postmenopausal women with primary, estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer. Despite this treatment, however, some patients have a relapse. METHODS: We conducted a double-blind, randomized trial to test whether, after two to three years of tamoxifen therapy, switching to exemestane was more effective than continuing tamoxifen therapy for the remainder of the five years of treatment. The primary end point was disease-free survival. RESULTS: Of the 4742 patients enrolled, 2362 were randomly assigned to switch to exemestane, and 2380 to continue to receive tamoxifen. After a median follow-up of 30.6 months, 449 first events (local or metastatic recurrence, contralateral breast cancer, or death) were reported--183 in the exemestane group and 266 in the tamoxifen group. The unadjusted hazard ratio in the exemestane group as compared with the tamoxifen group was 0.68 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.56 to 0.82; P<0.001 by the log-rank test), representing a 32 percent reduction in risk and corresponding to an absolute benefit in terms of disease-free survival of 4.7 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 2.6 to 6.8) at three years after randomization. Overall survival was not significantly different in the two groups, with 93 deaths occurring in the exemestane group and 106 in the tamoxifen group. Severe toxic effects of exemestane were rare. Contralateral breast cancer occurred in 20 patients in the tamoxifen group and 9 in the exemestane group (P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Exemestane therapy after two to three years of tamoxifen therapy significantly improved disease-free survival as compared with the standard five years of tamoxifen treatment.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis