Pazopanib in Locally Advanced or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Results of a Randomized Phase III Trial

Cora N. Sternberg(Ludwig Cancer Research), Ian D. Davis(Ludwig Cancer Research), Jozef Mardiak(Ludwig Cancer Research), Cezary Szczylik(Ludwig Cancer Research), Eunsik Lee(Ludwig Cancer Research), John Wagstaff(Ludwig Cancer Research), Carlos H. Barrios(Ludwig Cancer Research), Pamela Salman(Ludwig Cancer Research), Oleg Gladkov(Ludwig Cancer Research), Alexander Kavina(Ludwig Cancer Research), Juan José Zarbá(Ludwig Cancer Research), Mei Chen(Ludwig Cancer Research), Lauren McCann(Ludwig Cancer Research), Lini Pandite(Ludwig Cancer Research), Debasish Roychowdhury(Ludwig Cancer Research), Robert E. Hawkins(Ludwig Cancer Research)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
January 25, 2010
Cited by 2,479Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

PURPOSE Pazopanib is an oral angiogenesis inhibitor targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, platelet-derived growth factor receptor, and c-Kit. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study evaluated efficacy and safety of pazopanib monotherapy in treatment-naive and cytokine-pretreated patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Adult patients with measurable, locally advanced, and/or metastatic RCC were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive oral pazopanib or placebo. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included overall survival, tumor response rate (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors), and safety. Radiographic assessments of tumors were independently reviewed. Results Of 435 patients enrolled, 233 were treatment naive (54%) and 202 were cytokine pretreated (46%). PFS was significantly prolonged with pazopanib compared with placebo in the overall study population (median, PFS 9.2 v 4.2 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.46; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.62; P < .0001), the treatment-naive subpopulation (median PFS 11.1 v 2.8 months; HR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.60; P < .0001), and the cytokine-pretreated subpopulation (median PFS, 7.4 v 4.2 months; HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.84; P < .001). The objective response rate was 30% with pazopanib compared with 3% with placebo (P < .001). The median duration of response was longer than 1 year. The most common adverse events were diarrhea, hypertension, hair color changes, nausea, anorexia, and vomiting. There was no evidence of clinically important differences in quality of life for pazopanib versus placebo. CONCLUSION Pazopanib demonstrated significant improvement in PFS and tumor response compared with placebo in treatment-naive and cytokine-pretreated patients with advanced and/or metastatic RCC.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis