Effect of Structured Physical Activity on Prevention of Major Mobility Disability in Older Adults

Marco Pahor(University of Florida), Jack M. Guralnik(University of Maryland, Baltimore), Walter T. Ambrosius(Wake Forest University), Steven N. Blair(University of South Carolina), Denise E. Bonds(National Heart Lung and Blood Institute), Timothy S. Church(Pennington Biomedical Research Center), Mark A. Espeland(Wake Forest University), Roger A. Fielding(Jean Mayer Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging), Thomas M. Gill(Yale University), Erik J. Groessl(University of California, San Diego), ­Abby C. King(Stanford University), Stephen B. Kritchevsky(Wake Forest University), Todd M. Manini(University of Florida), Mary Mcdermott(Northwestern University), Michael E. Miller(Wake Forest University), Anne B. Newman(University of Pittsburgh), W. Jack Rejeski(Wake Forest University), Kaycee M. Sink(Wake Forest University), Jeff D. Williamson(Wake Forest University)
JAMA
May 27, 2014
Cited by 1,413Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: In older adults reduced mobility is common and is an independent risk factor for morbidity, hospitalization, disability, and mortality. Limited evidence suggests that physical activity may help prevent mobility disability; however, there are no definitive clinical trials examining whether physical activity prevents or delays mobility disability. OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that a long-term structured physical activity program is more effective than a health education program (also referred to as a successful aging program) in reducing the risk of major mobility disability. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Lifestyle Interventions and Independence for Elders (LIFE) study was a multicenter, randomized trial that enrolled participants between February 2010 and December 2011, who participated for an average of 2.6 years. Follow-up ended in December 2013. Outcome assessors were blinded to the intervention assignment. Participants were recruited from urban, suburban, and rural communities at 8 centers throughout the United States. We randomized a volunteer sample of 1635 sedentary men and women aged 70 to 89 years who had physical limitations, defined as a score on the Short Physical Performance Battery of 9 or below, but were able to walk 400 m. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomized to a structured, moderate-intensity physical activity program (n = 818) conducted in a center (twice/wk) and at home (3-4 times/wk) that included aerobic, resistance, and flexibility training activities or to a health education program (n = 817) consisting of workshops on topics relevant to older adults and upper extremity stretching exercises. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was major mobility disability objectively defined by loss of ability to walk 400 m. RESULTS: Incident major mobility disability occurred in 30.1% (246 participants) of the physical activity group and 35.5% (290 participants) of the health education group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.82 [95% CI, 0.69-0.98], P = .03).Persistent mobility disability was experienced by 120 participants (14.7%) in the physical activity group and 162 participants (19.8%) in the health education group (HR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.57-0.91]; P = .006). Serious adverse events were reported by 404 participants (49.4%) in the physical activity group and 373 participants (45.7%) in the health education group (risk ratio, 1.08 [95% CI, 0.98-1.20]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: A structured, moderate-intensity physical activity program compared with a health education program reduced major mobility disability over 2.6 years among older adults at risk for disability. These findings suggest mobility benefit from such a program in vulnerable older adults. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01072500.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis