Clinical Characterization of Familial Isolated Pituitary Adenomas

Adrian Daly(Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège), Marie‐Lise Jaffrain‐Rea(University of L'Aquila), A. Ciccarelli(Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège), Hernán Valdés-Socin(Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège), V. Rohmer(Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers), G. Tamburrano(Sapienza University of Rome), C. Borson-Chazot(Hôpital Lyon Sud), B. Estour(Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Étienne), E. Ciccarelli(University of Turin), Thierry Brue(Institut de Neurobiologie de la Méditerranée), Piero Ferollà(University of Perugia), Philippe Émy(Centre hospitalier universitaire d'Orléans), Annamaria Colao(Federico II University Hospital), Ernesto De Menis(Ca' Foncello Hospital), Philippe Lecomte(Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours), F. Penfornis(Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon), Brigitte Delemer(Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Reims), Jérôme Bertherat(Inserm), J.-L. Wémeau(Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille), Wouter W. de Herder(Erasmus MC), F. Archambeaud(Hôpital Dupuytren), Achille Stevenaert(Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège), Alain Calender(Hôpital Edouard Herriot), A. Murat(Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes), Francesco Cavagnini(IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano), Albert Beckers
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
June 20, 2006
Cited by 246Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

CONTEXT: Familial pituitary adenomas occur rarely in the absence of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) and Carney complex (CNC). OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to characterize the clinical and genealogical features of non-MEN1/CNC familial isolated pituitary adenomas (FIPA). DESIGN AND SETTING: We conducted a retrospective study of clinical and genealogical characteristics of FIPA cases and performed a comparison with a sporadic population at 22 university hospitals in Belgium, Italy, France, and The Netherlands. RESULTS: Sixty-four FIPA families including 138 affected individuals were identified [55 prolactinomas, 47 somatotropinomas, 28 nonsecreting adenomas (NS), and eight ACTH-secreting tumors]. Cases were MEN1/PRKAR1A-mutation negative. First-degree relationships predominated (75.6%) among affected individuals. A single tumor phenotype occurred in 30 families (homogeneous), and heterogeneous phenotypes occurred in 34 families. FIPA cases were younger at diagnosis than sporadic cases (P = 0.015); tumors were diagnosed earlier in the first vs. the second generation of multigenerational families. Macroadenomas were more frequent in heterogeneous vs. homogeneous FIPA families (P = 0.036). Prolactinomas from heterogeneous families were larger and had more frequent suprasellar extension (P = 0.004) than sporadic cases. Somatotropinomas occurred as isolated familial somatotropinoma cases and within heterogeneous FIPA families; isolated familial somatotropinoma cases represented 18% of FIPA cases and were younger at diagnosis than patients with sporadic somatotropinomas. Familial NS cases were younger at diagnosis (P = 0.03) and had more frequently invasive tumors (P = 0.024) than sporadic cases. CONCLUSIONS: Homogeneous and heterogeneous expression of prolactinomas, somatotropinomas, NS, and Cushing's disease can occur within families in the absence of MEN1/CNC. FIPA and sporadic cases have differing clinical characteristics. FIPA may represent a novel endocrine neoplasia classification that requires further genetic characterization.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis