Macitentan and Morbidity and Mortality in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

Tomás Pulido(Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College), Igor Adzerikho(Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College), Richard N. Channick(Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College), Marion Delcroix(Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College), Nazzareno Galiè(Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College), Hossein-Ardeschir Ghofrani(Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College), Pavel Jansa(Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College), Zhi‐Cheng Jing(Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College), Franck‐Olivier Le Brun(Instituto Nacional de Cardiología), Sanjay Mehta(Western University), Camilla Mittelholzer(Actelion (Switzerland)), Loı̈c Perchenet(Actelion (Switzerland)), B.K.S. Sastry(CARE Hospitals), Olivier Sitbon(Université Paris-Sud), Rogério Souza(Universidade de São Paulo), Adam Torbicki, Xiaofeng Zeng(Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College), Lewis J. Rubin(University of California San Diego), Gérald Simonneau(Université Paris-Sud)
New England Journal of Medicine
August 28, 2013
Cited by 1,430Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current therapies for pulmonary arterial hypertension have been adopted on the basis of short-term trials with exercise capacity as the primary end point. We assessed the efficacy of macitentan, a new dual endothelin-receptor antagonist, using a primary end point of morbidity and mortality in a long-term trial. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients with symptomatic pulmonary arterial hypertension to receive placebo once daily, macitentan at a once-daily dose of 3 mg, or macitentan at a once-daily dose of 10 mg. Stable use of oral or inhaled therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension, other than endothelin-receptor antagonists, was allowed at study entry. The primary end point was the time from the initiation of treatment to the first occurrence of a composite end point of death, atrial septostomy, lung transplantation, initiation of treatment with intravenous or subcutaneous prostanoids, or worsening of pulmonary arterial hypertension. RESULTS: A total of 250 patients were randomly assigned to placebo, 250 to the 3-mg macitentan dose, and 242 to the 10-mg macitentan dose. The primary end point occurred in 46.4%, 38.0%, and 31.4% of the patients in these groups, respectively. The hazard ratio for the 3-mg macitentan dose as compared with placebo was 0.70 (97.5% confidence interval [CI], 0.52 to 0.96; P=0.01), and the hazard ratio for the 10-mg macitentan dose as compared with placebo was 0.55 (97.5% CI, 0.39 to 0.76; P<0.001). Worsening of pulmonary arterial hypertension was the most frequent primary end-point event. The effect of macitentan on this end point was observed regardless of whether the patient was receiving therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension at baseline. Adverse events more frequently associated with macitentan than with placebo were headache, nasopharyngitis, and anemia. CONCLUSIONS: Macitentan significantly reduced morbidity and mortality among patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension in this event-driven study. (Funded by Actelion Pharmaceuticals; SERAPHIN ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00660179.).


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis