Risk of cancer after low doses of ionising radiation: retrospective cohort study in 15 countries

Elisabeth Cardis(Centre International de Recherche sur le Cancer), Martine Vrijheid(Centre International de Recherche sur le Cancer), Maria Blettner(Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz), Ethel S. Gilbert(National Cancer Institute), Matti Hakama(Tampere University), Catherine Hill(Institut Gustave Roussy), Geoffrey R. Howe(Columbia University), John Kaldor(National Centre for Clinical Research on Emerging Drugs), C R Muirhead(Health Protection Agency), Mary K. Schubauer‐Berigan(National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health), Takesumi Yoshimura(Fukuoka Institute of Health and Environmental Sciences), F. Bermann(Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives), G. Cowper(Atomic Energy (Canada)), J.J. Fix(Pacific Northwest National Laboratory), Carl D. Hacker(Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation), B. Heinmiller(Atomic Energy (Canada)), Michelle Marshall(EES Research (United Kingdom)), Isabelle Thierry-Chef(Centre International de Recherche sur le Cancer), David F. Utterback(National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health), Y-O Ahn(Seoul National University), E Amoros, Patrick Ashmore(Health Canada), Anssi Auvinen(Tampere University), J-M. Bae(Cheju Halla University), J Solano, A. Biau(Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire), E Combalot(Centre International de Recherche sur le Cancer), P. Deboodt(Belgian Nuclear Research Centre), Alberto Sacristán(Consejo de Seguridad Nuclear), Matias Eklöf(Vattenfall (Sweden)), Hilde Engels(Belgian Nuclear Research Centre), Gerda Engholm(Uppsala University), Gabriel Guliš(University of Trnava), Rima R. Habib(American University of Beirut), K Holan(Slovenské Elektrárne (Slovakia)), H. Hyvönen, A. Kerekes(Frédéric Joliot-Curie National Research Institute for Radiobiology and Radiohygiene), Juozas Kurtinaitis(National Cancer Institute), H Malker, Marco Martuzzi, A. Mastauskas(Lithuanian Social Research Centre), Annabelle Monnet(Merck Serono (Switzerland)), Mirjana Moser(Federal Office of Public Health), Mark S. Pearce(Newcastle University), David B. Richardson(North Carolina Division of Public Health), Fernando Rodríguez‐Artalejo(Universidad Autónoma de Madrid), A. Rogel, Hélène Tardy(Centre International de Recherche sur le Cancer), M. Telle‐Lamberton, I Turai(Frédéric Joliot-Curie National Research Institute for Radiobiology and Radiohygiene), M. Usel, Katalin Veress(Semmelweis University)
Cited by 600Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To provide direct estimates of risk of cancer after protracted low doses of ionising radiation and to strengthen the scientific basis of radiation protection standards for environmental, occupational, and medical diagnostic exposures. DESIGN: Multinational retrospective cohort study of cancer mortality. SETTING: Cohorts of workers in the nuclear industry in 15 countries. PARTICIPANTS: 407 391 workers individually monitored for external radiation with a total follow-up of 5.2 million person years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Estimates of excess relative risks per sievert (Sv) of radiation dose for mortality from cancers other than leukaemia and from leukaemia excluding chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, the main causes of death considered by radiation protection authorities. RESULTS: The excess relative risk for cancers other than leukaemia was 0.97 per Sv, 95% confidence interval 0.14 to 1.97. Analyses of causes of death related or unrelated to smoking indicate that, although confounding by smoking may be present, it is unlikely to explain all of this increased risk. The excess relative risk for leukaemia excluding chronic lymphocytic leukaemia was 1.93 per Sv (< 0 to 8.47). On the basis of these estimates, 1-2% of deaths from cancer among workers in this cohort may be attributable to radiation. CONCLUSIONS: These estimates, from the largest study of nuclear workers ever conducted, are higher than, but statistically compatible with, the risk estimates used for current radiation protection standards. The results suggest that there is a small excess risk of cancer, even at the low doses and dose rates typically received by nuclear workers in this study.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis