Sunitinib Malate for the Treatment of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Éric Raymond(Hôpital Beaujon), Laëtitia Dahan, Jean‐Luc Raoul(Centre Eugène Marquis), Yung‐Jue Bang(Seoul National University Hospital), Ivan Borbath(Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc), Catherine Lombard‐Bohas(Hospices Civils de Lyon), Juan W. Valle(National Health Service), Peter Metrakos(McGill University Health Centre), Denis Smith(Hôpital Saint-André), Aaron I. Vinik(Eastern Virginia Medical School), Jen‐Shi Chen(Chang Gung Memorial Hospital), Dieter Hörsch(Zentralklinik Bad Berka), Pascal Hammel(Hôpital Beaujon), Bertram Wiedenmann(Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin), Eric Van Cutsem(Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven), Shem Patyna(Pfizer (United States)), Dongrui R. Lu(Pfizer (United States)), C. Blanckmeister(Pfizer (United States)), Richard C. Chao(Pfizer (United States)), Philippe Ruszniewski(Hôpital Beaujon)
New England Journal of Medicine
February 9, 2011
Cited by 2,536

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib has shown activity against pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in preclinical models and phase 1 and 2 trials. METHODS: We conducted a multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial of sunitinib in patients with advanced, well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. All patients had Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors-defined disease progression documented within 12 months before baseline. A total of 171 patients were randomly assigned (in a 1:1 ratio) to receive best supportive care with either sunitinib at a dose of 37.5 mg per day or placebo. The primary end point was progression-free survival; secondary end points included the objective response rate, overall survival, and safety. RESULTS: The study was discontinued early, after the independent data and safety monitoring committee observed more serious adverse events and deaths in the placebo group as well as a difference in progression-free survival favoring sunitinib. Median progression-free survival was 11.4 months in the sunitinib group as compared with 5.5 months in the placebo group (hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26 to 0.66; P<0.001). A Cox proportional-hazards analysis of progression-free survival according to baseline characteristics favored sunitinib in all subgroups studied. The objective response rate was 9.3% in the sunitinib group versus 0% in the placebo group. At the data cutoff point, 9 deaths were reported in the sunitinib group (10%) versus 21 deaths in the placebo group (25%) (hazard ratio for death, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.89; P=0.02). The most frequent adverse events in the sunitinib group were diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, asthenia, and fatigue. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous daily administration of sunitinib at a dose of 37.5 mg improved progression-free survival, overall survival, and the objective response rate as compared with placebo among patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. (Funded by Pfizer; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00428597.).


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis