Treatment of multiple myeloma

Bart Barlogie(Cancer Research And Biostatistics), John D. Shaughnessy(Cancer Research And Biostatistics), Guido Tricot(Cancer Research And Biostatistics), Joth Jacobson(Cancer Research And Biostatistics), Maurizio Zangari(Cancer Research And Biostatistics), Elias Anaissie(Cancer Research And Biostatistics), Ron Walker(Cancer Research And Biostatistics), John Crowley(Cancer Research And Biostatistics)
Blood
September 16, 2003
Cited by 465Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Autologous peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC)-supported high-dose melphalan is now considered standard therapy for myeloma, at least for younger patients. The markedly reduced toxicity of allotransplants using nonmyeloablative regimens (mini-allotransplantations) may hold promise for more widely exploiting the well-documented graft-versus-myeloma (GVM) effect. New active drugs include immunomodulatory agents, such as thalidomide and CC-5013 (Revimid; Celgene, Warren, NJ), and the proteasome inhibitor, PS 341 (Velcade; Millenium, Cambridge, MA), all of which not only target myeloma cells directly but also exert an indirect effect by suppressing growth and survival signals elaborated by the bone marrow microenvironment's interaction with myeloma cells. Among the prognostic factors evaluated, cytogenetic abnormalities (CAs), which are present in one third of patients with newly diagnosed disease, identify a particularly poor prognosis subgroup with a median survival not exceeding 2 to 3 years. By contrast, in the absence of CAs, 4-year survival rates of 80% to 90% can be obtained with tandem autotransplantations. Fundamental and clinical research should, therefore, focus on the molecular and biologic mechanisms of treatment failure in the high-risk subgroup.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis