Randomized Phase III Trial of Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin Compared With Single-Agent Gemcitabine As First-Line Treatment of Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: The GIP-1 Study

Giuseppe Colucci(Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti), Roberto Labianca(Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti), Francesco Di Costanzo(Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti), Vittorio Gebbia(Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti), Giacomo Cartenì(Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti), B. Massidda(Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti), E. Dapretto(Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti), Luigi Manzione(Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti), Elena Piazza(Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti), Mirella Sannicolò(Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti), Marco Ciaparrone(Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti), Luigi Cavanna(Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti), Francesco Giuliani(Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti), Evaristo Maiello(Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti), Antonio Testa(Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti), Paolo Pederzoli(Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti), Massimo Falconi(Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti), Ciro Gallo(Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti), Massimo Di Maïo(Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti), Francesco Perrone(Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
March 2, 2010
Cited by 301Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

PURPOSE: Single-agent gemcitabine became standard first-line treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer after demonstration of superiority compared with fluorouracil. The Gruppo Italiano Pancreas 1 randomized phase III trial aimed to compare gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus gemcitabine alone (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT00813696). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer, age 18 to 75 years, and Karnofsky performance status (KPS) > or = 50, were randomly assigned to receive gemcitabine (arm A) or gemcitabine plus cisplatin (arm B). Arm A: gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) weekly for 7 weeks, and, after a 1-week rest, on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks. Arm B: cisplatin 25 mg/m(2) added weekly to gemcitabine, except cycle 1 day 22. Primary end point was overall survival. To have 8% power of detecting a 0.74 hazard ratio (HR) of death, with bilateral alpha .05, 355 events were needed and 400 patients planned. RESULTS: Four hundred patients were enrolled (arm A: 199; arm B: 201). Median age was 63, 59% were male, 84% had stage IV, and 83% had KPS > or = 80. Median overall survival was 8.3 months versus 7.2 months in arm A and B, respectively (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.89 to 1.35; P = .38). Median progression-free survival was 3.9 months versus 3.8 months in arm A and B, respectively (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.80 to 1.19; P = .80). The objective response rate was 10.1% in A and 12.9% in B (P = .37). Clinical benefit was experienced by 23.0% in A and 15.1% in B (P = .057). Combination therapy produced more hematologic toxicity, without relevant differences in nonhematologic toxicity. CONCLUSION: The addition of weekly cisplatin to gemcitabine failed to demonstrate any improvement as first-line treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis