Competency-based medical education: theory to practice

Jason R. Frank(University of Ottawa), Linda Snell(McGill University), Olle ten Cate(Utrecht University), Eric S. Holmboe(American Board of Internal Medicine), Carol Carraccio(University of Maryland, Baltimore), Susan R. Swing(Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education), Peter Harris, Nicholas Glasgow(Australian National University), Craig Campbell(Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada), Deepak Dath(McMaster University), Ronald M. Harden(University of Dundee), William Iobst(American Board of Internal Medicine), Donlin M. Long(Johns Hopkins University), Rani Mungroo(Canadiana.org), Denyse Richardson(University of Toronto), Jonathan Sherbino(Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada), Ivan Silver(University of Toronto), Sarah Taber(Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada), Martin Talbot(University of Sheffield), Kenneth A. Harris(Western University)
Medical Teacher
July 27, 2010
Cited by 2,660

Abstract

Although competency-based medical education (CBME) has attracted renewed interest in recent years among educators and policy-makers in the health care professions, there is little agreement on many aspects of this paradigm. We convened a unique partnership - the International CBME Collaborators - to examine conceptual issues and current debates in CBME. We engaged in a multi-stage group process and held a consensus conference with the aim of reviewing the scholarly literature of competency-based medical education, identifying controversies in need of clarification, proposing definitions and concepts that could be useful to educators across many jurisdictions, and exploring future directions for this approach to preparing health professionals. In this paper, we describe the evolution of CBME from the outcomes movement in the 20th century to a renewed approach that, focused on accountability and curricular outcomes and organized around competencies, promotes greater learner-centredness and de-emphasizes time-based curricular design. In this paradigm, competence and related terms are redefined to emphasize their multi-dimensional, dynamic, developmental, and contextual nature. CBME therefore has significant implications for the planning of medical curricula and will have an important impact in reshaping the enterprise of medical education. We elaborate on this emerging CBME approach and its related concepts, and invite medical educators everywhere to enter into further dialogue about the promise and the potential perils of competency-based medical curricula for the 21st century.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis