Gene Expression Classification of Colon Cancer into Molecular Subtypes: Characterization, Validation, and Prognostic Value

Laëtitia Marisa(La Ligue Contre le Cancer), Aurélien de Reyniès(La Ligue Contre le Cancer), Alex Duval(Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine), Janick Sèlves(Université Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées), Marie Pierre Gaub(Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg), Laure Vescovo(La Ligue Contre le Cancer), Marie-Christine Étienne-Grimaldi(Centre Antoine Lacassagne), Renaud Schiappa(La Ligue Contre le Cancer), Dominique Guénot(Université de Strasbourg), Mira Ayadi(La Ligue Contre le Cancer), Sylvain Kirzin(Inserm), M Chazal, Jean–François Fléjou(Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris), Daniel Benchimol(Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice), Anne Berger(Hôpital Européen), Arnaud Lagarde(Hôpital de la Timone), Erwan Pencreach(Laboratoire de Biochimie), F Piard(CHU Dijon Bourgogne), Dominique Élias(Institut Gustave Roussy), Yann Parc(Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris), Sylviane Olschwang(Hôpital Ambroise-Paré), G. Milano(Centre Antoine Lacassagne), Pierre Laurent‐Puig(Inserm), Valérie Boige(Inserm)
PLoS Medicine
May 21, 2013
Cited by 1,537Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Colon cancer (CC) pathological staging fails to accurately predict recurrence, and to date, no gene expression signature has proven reliable for prognosis stratification in clinical practice, perhaps because CC is a heterogeneous disease. The aim of this study was to establish a comprehensive molecular classification of CC based on mRNA expression profile analyses. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Fresh-frozen primary tumor samples from a large multicenter cohort of 750 patients with stage I to IV CC who underwent surgery between 1987 and 2007 in seven centers were characterized for common DNA alterations, including BRAF, KRAS, and TP53 mutations, CpG island methylator phenotype, mismatch repair status, and chromosomal instability status, and were screened with whole genome and transcriptome arrays. 566 samples fulfilled RNA quality requirements. Unsupervised consensus hierarchical clustering applied to gene expression data from a discovery subset of 443 CC samples identified six molecular subtypes. These subtypes were associated with distinct clinicopathological characteristics, molecular alterations, specific enrichments of supervised gene expression signatures (stem cell phenotype-like, normal-like, serrated CC phenotype-like), and deregulated signaling pathways. Based on their main biological characteristics, we distinguished a deficient mismatch repair subtype, a KRAS mutant subtype, a cancer stem cell subtype, and three chromosomal instability subtypes, including one associated with down-regulated immune pathways, one with up-regulation of the Wnt pathway, and one displaying a normal-like gene expression profile. The classification was validated in the remaining 123 samples plus an independent set of 1,058 CC samples, including eight public datasets. Furthermore, prognosis was analyzed in the subset of stage II-III CC samples. The subtypes C4 and C6, but not the subtypes C1, C2, C3, and C5, were independently associated with shorter relapse-free survival, even after adjusting for age, sex, stage, and the emerging prognostic classifier Oncotype DX Colon Cancer Assay recurrence score (hazard ratio 1.5, 95% CI 1.1-2.1, p = 0.0097). However, a limitation of this study is that information on tumor grade and number of nodes examined was not available. CONCLUSIONS: We describe the first, to our knowledge, robust transcriptome-based classification of CC that improves the current disease stratification based on clinicopathological variables and common DNA markers. The biological relevance of these subtypes is illustrated by significant differences in prognosis. This analysis provides possibilities for improving prognostic models and therapeutic strategies. In conclusion, we report a new classification of CC into six molecular subtypes that arise through distinct biological pathways.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis