Localized Ewing Tumor of Bone: Final Results of the Cooperative Ewing’s Sarcoma Study CESS 86

Michael Paulussen(Goethe University Frankfurt), S. Ahrens(Goethe University Frankfurt), Jürgen Dunst(Goethe University Frankfurt), Winfried Winkelmann(Goethe University Frankfurt), G. Ulrich Exner(Goethe University Frankfurt), R. Kotz(Goethe University Frankfurt), Gabriele Amann(Goethe University Frankfurt), Barbara Dockhorn‐Dworniczak(Goethe University Frankfurt), D. Harms(Goethe University Frankfurt), St. Müller-Weihrich(Goethe University Frankfurt), Karl Welte(Goethe University Frankfurt), B. Kornhuber(Goethe University Frankfurt), G. Janka‐Schaub(Goethe University Frankfurt), U. Göbel(Goethe University Frankfurt), J. Treuner(Goethe University Frankfurt), P.A. Voûte(Goethe University Frankfurt), A. Zoubek(Goethe University Frankfurt), Helmut Gadner(Goethe University Frankfurt), Heribert Jürgens(Goethe University Frankfurt)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
March 15, 2001
Cited by 443

Abstract

PURPOSE: Cooperative Ewing's Sarcoma Study (CESS) 86 aimed at improving event-free survival (EFS) in patients with high-risk localized Ewing tumor of bone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed 301 patients recruited from January 1986 to July 1991 (60% male; median age 15 years). Tumors of volume >100 mL and/or at central-axis sites qualified patients for "high risk" (HR, n = 241), and small extremity lesions for "standard risk" (SR, n = 52). Standard-risk patients received 12 courses of vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin alternating with actinomycin D (VACA); HR patients received ifosfamide instead of cyclophosphamide (VAIA). Tumor sites were pelvis (27%), other central axis (28%), femur (19%), or other extremity (26%). The initial tumor volume was <100 mL in 33% of cases and > or =100 mL in 67%. Local therapy was surgery (23%), surgery plus radiotherapy (49%), or radiotherapy alone (28%). Event-free survival rates were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analyses, comparisons were done by log-rank test, and risk factors were analyzed by Cox models. RESULTS: On May 1, 1999 (median time under study, 133 months), the 10-year EFS was 0.52. Event-free survival did not differ between SR-VACA (0.52) and HR-VAIA (0.51, P =.92). Tumor volume of >200 mL (EFS, 0.36 v 0.63 for smaller tumors; P =.0001) and poor histologic response (EFS, 0.38 v 0.64 for good responders; P =.0007) had negative impacts on EFS. In multivariate analyses, small tumor volumes of <200 mL, good histologic response, and VAIA chemotherapy augured for fair outcome. Six of 301 patients (2%) died under treatment, and four patients (1.3%) developed second malignancies. CONCLUSION: Fifty-two percent of CESS 86 patients survived after risk-adapted therapy. High-risk patients seem to have benefited from intensified treatment that incorporated ifosfamide.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis