Prognostic Relevance of Gene Amplifications and Coamplifications in Breast Cancer

Khawla S. Al‐Kuraya(University of Basel), Peter Schraml(University of Basel), J. Torhorst(University of Basel), Coya Tapia(University of Basel), Boriana Zaharieva(Medical University of Sofia), Hedvika Novotny(University of Basel), Hanspeter Spichtin(Institute of Molecular and Clinical Ophthalmology Basel), Robert Maurer(Triemli Hospital), Martina Mirlacher(University of Basel), Ossi R. Köchli, Markus Zuber(Kantonsschule Olten), Holger Dieterich, Friedrich Mross(Kliniken des Landkreises Lörrach), Kim Wilber, Ronald Simon(University of Basel), Guido Sauter(University of Basel)
Cancer Research
December 1, 2004
Cited by 349

Abstract

Multiple different oncogenes have been described previously to be amplified in breast cancer including HER2, EGFR, MYC, CCND1, and MDM2. Gene amplification results in oncogene overexpression but may also serve as an indicator of genomic instability. As such, presence of one or several gene amplifications may have prognostic significance. To assess the prognostic importance of amplifications and coamplifications of HER2, EGFR, MYC, CCND1, and MDM2 in breast cancer, we analyzed a breast cancer tissue microarray containing samples from 2197 cancers with follow-up information. Fluorescence in situ hybridizations revealed amplifications of CCND1 in 20.1%, HER2 in 17.3%, MDM2 in 5.7%, MYC in 5.3%, and EGFR in 0.8% of the tumors. All gene amplifications were significantly associated with high grade. HER2 (P < 0.001) and MYC amplification (P < 0.001) were also linked to shortened survival. In case of HER2, this was independent of grade, pT, and pN categories. MYC amplification was almost 3 times more frequent in medullary cancer (15.9%), than in the histologic subtype with the second highest frequency (ductal; 5.6%; P = 0.0046). HER2 and MYC amplification were associated with estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor negativity (P < 0.001) whereas CCND1 amplification was linked to estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor positivity (P < 0.001). Coamplifications were more prevalent than expected based on the individual frequencies. Coamplifications of one or several other oncogenes occurred in 29.6% of CCND1, 43% of HER2, 55.7% of MDM2, 65% of MYC, and 72.8% of EGFR-amplified cancers. HER2/MYC-coamplified cancers had a worse prognosis than tumors with only one of these amplifications. Furthermore, a gradual decrease of survival was observed with increasing number of amplifications. In conclusion, these data support a major prognostic impact of genomic instability as determined by a broad gene amplification survey in breast cancer.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis