Guidelines for using human event‐related potentials to study cognition: Recording standards and publication criteria

Terence W. Picton(Baycrest Hospital), Shlomo Bentin(Hebrew University of Jerusalem), Patrick Berg(University of Konstanz), Emanuel Donchin(University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign), S. A. Hillyard(University of California San Diego), Randall S. Johnson(Queens College, CUNY), Gregory A. Miller(University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign), Walter Ritter(Albert Einstein College of Medicine), Daniel S. Ruchkin(University of Maryland, Baltimore), Michael D. Rugg, Margot J. Taylor(Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier)
Psychophysiology
March 1, 2000
Cited by 2,074

Abstract

Event-related potentials (ERPs) recorded from the human scalp can provide important information about how the human brain normally processes information and about how this processing may go awry in neurological or psychiatric disorders. Scientists using or studying ERPs must strive to overcome the many technical problems that can occur in the recording and analysis of these potentials. The methods and the results of these ERP studies must be published in a way that allows other scientists to understand exactly what was done so that they can, if necessary, replicate the experiments. The data must then be analyzed and presented in a way that allows different studies to be compared readily. This paper presents guidelines for recording ERPs and criteria for publishing the results.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis