Report of an International Workshop to Standardize Baseline Evaluation and Response Criteria for Primary CNS Lymphoma

Lauren E. Abrey(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Tracy T. Batchelor(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Andrés J.M. Ferreri(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Mary Gospodarowicz(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Elisa Jacobsen Pulczynski(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Emanuele Zucca(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Justine R. Smith(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Agnieszka Korfel(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Carole Soussain(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Lisa M. DeAngelis(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Edward A. Neuwelt(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Brian Patrick O’Neill(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Eckhard Thiel(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Tamara Shenkier(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Francesc Graus(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Martin J. van den Bent(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), John F. Seymour(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Philip Poortmans(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Jamés O. Armitage(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Franco Cavalli(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
June 15, 2005
Cited by 901

Abstract

Standardized guidelines for the baseline evaluation and response assessment of primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) are critical to ensure comparability among clinical trials for newly diagnosed patients. The relative rarity of this tumor precludes rapid completion of large-scale phase III trials and, therefore, our reliance on the results of well-designed phase II trials is critical. To formulate this recommendation, an international group of experts representing hematologic oncology, medical oncology, neuro-oncology, neurology, radiation oncology, neurosurgery, and ophthalmology met to review current standards of reporting and to formulate a consensus opinion regarding minimum baseline evaluation and common standards for assessing response to therapy. The response guidelines were based on the results of neuroimaging, corticosteroid use, ophthalmologic examination, and CSF cytology. A critical issue that requires additional study is the optimal method to assess the neurocognitive impact of therapy and address the quality of life of PCNSL survivors. We hope that these guidelines will improve communication among investigators and comparability among clinical trials in a way that will allow us to develop better therapies for patients.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis