The discriminative capacity of soluble Toll-like receptor (sTLR)2 and sTLR4 in inflammatory diseases

Jaap ten Oever(Radboud University Medical Center), Matthijs Kox(Radboud University Medical Center), Frank L. van de Veerdonk(Radboud University Nijmegen), Khutso M. Mothapo(Radboud University Nijmegen), Adriana Slavcovici(Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy), Tim Jansen(Radboud University Nijmegen), Lieke Tweehuysen(Sint Maartenskliniek), Evangelos J. Giamarellos‐Bourboulis(National and Kapodistrian University of Athens), Peter M. Schneeberger(Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis), Peter C. Wever(Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis), Monique Stoffels(Radboud University Medical Center), Anna Simon(Radboud University Medical Center), Jos WM van der Meer(Radboud University Medical Center), Melissa D. Johnson(Duke Medical Center), Bart Jan Kullberg(Radboud University Medical Center), Peter Pickkers(Radboud University Medical Center), Alexandre Pachot(bioMérieux (France)), Leo A. B. Joosten(Radboud University Nijmegen), Mihai G. Netea(Radboud University Nijmegen)
BMC Immunology
November 18, 2014
Cited by 69Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The extracellular domains of cytokine receptors are released during inflammation, but little is known about the shedding of Toll-like receptors (TLR) and whether they can be used as diagnostic biomarkers. METHODS: The release of sTLR2 and sTLR4 was studied in in-vitro stimulations, as well as in-vivo during experimental human endotoxemia (n = 11, 2 ng/kg LPS), and in plasma of 394 patients with infections (infectious mononucleosis, measles, respiratory tract infections, bacterial sepsis and candidemia) or non-infectious inflammation (Crohn's disease, gout, rheumatoid arthritis, autoinflammatory syndromes and pancreatitis). Using C-statistics, the value of sTLR2 and sTLR4 levels for discrimination between infections and non-infectious inflammatory diseases, as well as between viral and bacterial infections was analyzed. RESULTS: In-vitro, peripheral blood mononuclear cells released sTLR2 and sTLR4 by exposure to microbial ligands. During experimental human endotoxemia, plasma concentrations peaked after 2 hours (sTLR4) and 4 hours (sTLR2). sTLR4 did not correlate with cytokines, but sTLR2 correlated positively with TNFα (rs = 0.80, P < 0.05), IL-6 (rs = 0.65, P < 0.05), and IL-1Ra (rs = 0.57, P = 0.06), and negatively with IL-10 (rs = -0.58, P = 0.06), respectively. sTLR4 had a similar area under the ROC curve [AUC] for differentiating infectious and non-infectious inflammation compared to CRP: 0.72 (95% CI 0.66-0.79) versus 0.74 (95% CI 0.69-0.80) [P = 0.80], while sTLR2 had a lower AUC: 0.60 (95% CI 0.54-0.66) [P = 0.0004]. CRP differentiated bacterial infections better from viral infections than sTLR2 and sTLR4: AUC 0.94 (95% CI 0.90-0.96) versus 0.58 (95% CI 0.51-0.64) and 0.75 (95% CI 0.70-0.80), respectively [P < 0.0001 for both]. CONCLUSIONS: sTLRs are released into the circulation, and suggest the possibility to use sTLRs as diagnostic tool in inflammatory conditions.


Related Papers