Mutation of the Wilms’ Tumor 1 Gene Is a Poor Prognostic Factor Associated With Chemotherapy Resistance in Normal Karyotype Acute Myeloid Leukemia: The United Kingdom Medical Research Council Adult Leukaemia Working Party

Priya Virappane(Queen Mary University of London), Rosemary E. Gale(Evangelismos Hospital), Robert K. Hills(Evangelismos Hospital), Ιoannis Kakkas(Evangelismos Hospital), Karin E. Summers(Evangelismos Hospital), Jane Stevens(Evangelismos Hospital), Christopher Allen(Evangelismos Hospital), Claire Green(Evangelismos Hospital), Hilmar Quentmeier(Evangelismos Hospital), Hans G. Drexler(Evangelismos Hospital), Alan K. Burnett(Evangelismos Hospital), David C. Linch(Evangelismos Hospital), Dominique Bonnet(Evangelismos Hospital), Tim Lister(Evangelismos Hospital), Jude Fitzgibbon(Cancer Research UK)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
July 1, 2008
Cited by 208Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the clinical relevance of Wilms' tumor 1 (WT1) gene mutations in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with normal karyotype (NK). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Exons 7 and 9 of WT1 were screened in samples from 470 young adult NK AMLs using a combination of direct sequencing and high-resolution capillary electrophoresis. RESULTS: Overall, 51 mutations were detected in 47 cases (10%): 46 frameshift mutations with insertion/deletion of one to 28 base pairs in exon 7 (n = 45) or exon 9 (n = 1), with a median mutant level of 45% (range, 8% to 86%), and five substitutions in exon 9: D396N (n = 3), H397Y (n = 1) and H397Q (n = 1). Patients with WT1 mutations had an inferior response to induction chemotherapy compared with wild-type cases (complete remission rate, 79% v 90%, odds ratio [OR] = 3.02; 95% CI, 1.17 to 7.82; P = .02), a higher rate of resistant disease (15% v 4%; OR = 9.33; 95% CI, 2.38 to 36.6; P = .001), an increased cumulative incidence of relapse (67% v 43%, hazard ratio [HR] = 3.02; 95% CI, 1.69 to 5.38; P = .0008), with a reduction in both relapse-free survival (22% v 44%; HR = 2.16; 95% CI, 1.32 to 3.55; P = .005) and overall survival (26% v 47%; HR = 1.91; 95% CI, 1.23 to 2.95; P = .007) at 5 years. In multivariate analysis, which included FLT3 internal tandem duplication and NPM1 mutation status, the presence of a WT1 mutation remained an independent adverse prognostic factor. CONCLUSION: WT1 mutations are a negative prognostic indicator in NK AML and may be suitable for the development of targeted therapy.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis