Efficacy and Safety of Sirolimus in Lymphangioleiomyomatosis

Francis X. McCormack(University of Cincinnati Medical Center), Yoshikazu Inoue(National Kinki Chuo Hospital for Chest Disease), Joel Moss(National Heart Lung and Blood Institute), L.G. Singer(University of Toronto), Charlie Strange(Medical University of South Carolina), Koh Nakata(Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital), Alan F. Barker(Oregon Health & Science University), Jeffrey T. Chapman(Cleveland Clinic), Mark Brantly(University of Florida), James Stocks(The University of Texas Health Science Center at Tyler), Kevin K. Brown(University of Colorado Denver), Joseph P. Lynch(University of California, Los Angeles), Hilary J. Goldberg(Harvard University), Lisa R. Young(Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center), Brent W. Kinder(University of Cincinnati), Gregory P. Downey(University of Toronto), Eugene J. Sullivan(United Therapeutics (United States)), Thomas V. Colby(Mayo Clinic in Arizona), Roy T. McKay(University of Cincinnati), Marsha M. Cohen(University of Toronto), Leslie Korbee(Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center), Angelo M. Taveira‐DaSilva(National Heart Lung and Blood Institute), Hye Seung Lee(University of South Florida), Jeffrey P. Krischer(University of South Florida), Bruce C. Trapnell(Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center)
New England Journal of Medicine
March 16, 2011
Cited by 1,112Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM) is a progressive, cystic lung disease in women; it is associated with inappropriate activation of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling, which regulates cellular growth and lymphangiogenesis. Sirolimus (also called rapamycin) inhibits mTOR and has shown promise in phase 1-2 trials involving patients with LAM. METHODS: We conducted a two-stage trial of sirolimus involving 89 patients with LAM who had moderate lung impairment--a 12-month randomized, double-blind comparison of sirolimus with placebo, followed by a 12-month observation period. The primary end point was the difference between the groups in the rate of change (slope) in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)). RESULTS: During the treatment period, the FEV(1) slope was -12±2 ml per month in the placebo group (43 patients) and 1±2 ml per month in the sirolimus group (46 patients) (P<0.001). The absolute between-group difference in the mean change in FEV(1) during the treatment period was 153 ml, or approximately 11% of the mean FEV(1) at enrollment. As compared with the placebo group, the sirolimus group had improvement from baseline to 12 months in measures of forced vital capacity, functional residual capacity, serum vascular endothelial growth factor D (VEGF-D), and quality of life and functional performance. There was no significant between-group difference in this interval in the change in 6-minute walk distance or diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide. After discontinuation of sirolimus, the decline in lung function resumed in the sirolimus group and paralleled that in the placebo group. Adverse events were more common with sirolimus, but the frequency of serious adverse events did not differ significantly between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with LAM, sirolimus stabilized lung function, reduced serum VEGF-D levels, and was associated with a reduction in symptoms and improvement in quality of life. Therapy with sirolimus may be useful in selected patients with LAM. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and others; MILES ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00414648.).


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis