Comparison of Levofloxacin versus Moxifloxacin for Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis

Won‐Jung Koh(Samsung Medical Center), Seung Heon Lee(Korea University), Young Ae Kang(Yonsei University), Chang‐Hoon Lee(Seoul National University), Jae Chol Choi(Chung-Ang University), Jae Ho Lee(Seoul National University Bundang Hospital), Seung Hun Jang(Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital), Kwang Ha Yoo(Konkuk University), Ki Hwan Jung(Korea University), Ki Uk Kim(Daegu Catholic University), Sang Bong Choi(Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital), Yon Ju Ryu(Ewha Womans University Medical Center), Kyung Chan Kim(Daegu Catholic University), Soo‐Jung Um(Dong-A University), Yong Soo Kwon(Chonnam National University Hospital), Yee Hyung Kim(Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong), Jae Hwa Cho(Keimyung University), Kyeongman Jeon(Samsung Medical Center), Yong Il Hwang(Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital), Se Joong Kim(Korea University), Young Seok Lee(Inje University Busan Paik Hospital), Eun Young Heo(Seoul National University), JuHee Lee(Seoul National University Bundang Hospital), Yeo Woon Ki(Seoul National University), Tae Sun Shim(Ulsan College), Jae‐Joon Yim(Seoul National University)
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
August 8, 2013
Cited by 71Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

RATIONALE: Levofloxacin (LFX) and moxifloxacin (MXF) are the two most frequently recommended fluoroquinolones for treatment of patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). However, studies comparing the effectiveness of LFX and MXF among patients with MDR-TB are lacking. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness of LFX and MXF in terms of culture conversion after 3 months of treatment for MDR-TB. METHODS: In this prospective multicenter randomized open label trial, we randomly assigned 182 patients with MDR-TB (sensitive to LFX and MXF) to receive either LFX (750 mg/day; 90 patients) or MXF (400 mg/day; 92 patients) with a background drug regimen. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who achieved sputum culture conversion at 3 months of treatment. Secondary outcomes were time to culture conversion and time to smear conversion, with data censored at 3 months, and the proportions of adverse drug reactions. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: At 3 months of treatment, 68 (88.3%) of the 77 patients in the LFX group and 67 (90.5%) of the 74 in the MXF group showed conversion to negative sputum cultures (odds ratio for LFX compared with MXF, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.27-2.20). Adverse drug reactions were reported in six patients (7.7%) in the LFX group and four (5.2%) in the MXF group (P = 0.75). CONCLUSIONS: The choice of LFX or MXF for treatment of patients with MDR-TB may not affect sputum culture conversion at 3 months of treatment. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 01055145).


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis