Improved Retention Associated With Community-Based Accompaniment for Antiretroviral Therapy Delivery in Rural Rwanda

Molly F. Franke(Partners In Health), Felix Kaigamba(Ministry of Health), Adrienne Socci(Partners In Health), Massudi Hakizamungu(Partners In Health), Anita Patel(Partners In Health), Emmanuel Bagiruwigize(Ministry of Health), Peter Niyigena(Partners In Health), Kelly D. C. Walker(Partners In Health), Henry Epino(Brigham and Women's Hospital), Agnès Binagwaho(Harvard University), Joia S. Mukherjee(Brigham and Women's Hospital), Paul E. Farmer(Brigham and Women's Hospital), Michael Rich(Brigham and Women's Hospital)
Clinical Infectious Diseases
December 18, 2012
Cited by 161Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Minimizing death and ensuring high retention and good adherence remain ongoing challenges for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) treatment programs. We examined whether the addition of community-based accompaniment (characterized by daily home visits from a community health worker, directly observed treatment, nutritional support, transportation stipends, and other support as needed) to the Rwanda national model for antiretroviral therapy (ART) delivery would improve retention in care, viral load suppression, and change in CD4 count, relative to the national model alone. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational cohort study among 610 HIV-infected adults initiating ART in 1 of 2 programs in rural Rwanda. Psychosocial and clinical characteristics were recorded at ART initiation. Death, treatment retention, and plasma viral load were assessed at 1 year. CD4 count was evaluated at 6-month intervals. Multivariable regression models were used to adjust for baseline differences between the 2 populations. RESULTS: Eighty-five percent and 79% of participants in the community-based and clinic-based programs, respectively, were retained with viral load suppression at 1 year. After adjusting for CD4 count, depression, physical health quality of life, and food insecurity, community-based accompaniment was protective against death or loss to follow-up during the first year of ART (hazard ratio, 0.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], .09-.35; P < .0001). In a second multivariable analysis, individuals receiving accompaniment were more likely to be retained with a suppressed viral load at 1 year (risk ratio: 1.15; 95% CI, 1.03-1.27; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that community-based accompaniment is effective in improving retention, when added to a clinic-based program with fewer patient support mechanisms.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis