Setting Priorities in Global Child Health Research Investments: Guidelines for Implementation of the CHNRI Method

Igor Rudan(University of Edinburgh), Jennifer L. Gibson(University of Toronto), Shanthi Ameratunga(University of Auckland), Shams El Arifeen, Zulfiqar A Bhutta(Aga Khan University), Maureen M. Black(University of Maryland, Baltimore), Robert E. Black(Johns Hopkins University), Kenneth H. Brown(University of California, Davis), Harry Campbell(University of Edinburgh), Ilona Carneiro(London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine), Kit Yee Chan(University of Melbourne), Daniel Chandramohan(London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine), Mickey Chopra(South African Medical Research Council), Simon Cousens(London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine), Gary L. Darmstadt(Johns Hopkins University), Julie Meeks Gardner(University of the West Indies System), Sonja Y. Hess(University of California, Davis), Adnan A. Hyder(Johns Hopkins University), Lydia Kapiriri(University of Toronto), Margaret Kosek(Johns Hopkins University), Claudio F. Lanata, Mary Ann Lansang, Joy E Lawn, Mark Tomlinson(South African Medical Research Council), Alexander C. Tsai(University of California, San Francisco), Jayne Webster(London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine)
Croatian Medical Journal
December 1, 2008
Cited by 280Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

This article provides detailed guidelines for the implementation of systematic method for setting priorities in health research investments that was recently developed by Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative (CHNRI). The target audience for the proposed method are international agencies, large research funding donors, and national governments and policy-makers. The process has the following steps: (i) selecting the managers of the process; (ii) specifying the context and risk management preferences; (iii) discussing criteria for setting health research priorities; (iv) choosing a limited set of the most useful and important criteria; (v) developing means to assess the likelihood that proposed health research options will satisfy the selected criteria; (vi) systematic listing of a large number of proposed health research options; (vii) pre-scoring check of all competing health research options; (viii) scoring of health research options using the chosen set of criteria; (ix) calculating intermediate scores for each health research option; (x) obtaining further input from the stakeholders; (xi) adjusting intermediate scores taking into account the values of stakeholders; (xii) calculating overall priority scores and assigning ranks; (xiii) performing an analysis of agreement between the scorers; (xiv) linking computed research priority scores with investment decisions; (xv) feedback and revision. The CHNRI method is a flexible process that enables prioritizing health research investments at any level: institutional, regional, national, international, or global.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis