Autologous Transplantation and Maintenance Therapy in Multiple Myeloma

Antonio Palumbo(Azienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino), Federica Cavallo(University of Turin), Francesca Gay(University of Turin), Francesco Di Raimondo(University of Catania), Dina Ben Yehuda(Hadassah Academic College), Maria Teresa Petrucci(Sapienza University of Rome), Sara Pezzatti(Azienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo), Tommaso Caravita(St. Eugenio Hospital), Chiara Cerrato(University of Turin), Elena Ribakovsky(Sheba Medical Center), Mariella Genuardi(University of Turin), Anna Maria Cafro, Magda Marcatti(Vita-Salute San Raffaele University), Lucio Catalano(Federico II University Hospital), Massimo Offidani(Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona), Angelo Michele Carella(Ospedale Policlinico San Martino), Elena Zamagni, Francesca Patriarca(Ospedale Santa Maria della Misericordia di Udine), Pellegrino Musto(Centro di Riferimento Oncologico della Basilicata), Andrea Evangelista(Azienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino), Giovannino Ciccone(Azienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino), Paola Omedè(University of Turin), Claudia Crippa(Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia), Paolo Corradini(University of Milan), Arnon Nagler(Sheba Medical Center), Mario Boccadoro(University of Turin), Michèle Cavo
New England Journal of Medicine
September 3, 2014
Cited by 779Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This open-label, randomized, phase 3 study compared melphalan at a dose of 200 mg per square meter of body-surface area plus autologous stem-cell transplantation with melphalan-prednisone-lenalidomide (MPR) and compared lenalidomide maintenance therapy with no maintenance therapy in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. METHODS: We randomly assigned 273 patients 65 years of age or younger to high-dose melphalan plus stem-cell transplantation or MPR consolidation therapy after induction, and 251 patients to lenalidomide maintenance therapy or no maintenance therapy. The primary end point was progression-free survival. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 51.2 months. Both progression-free and overall survival were significantly longer with high-dose melphalan plus stem-cell transplantation than with MPR (median progression-free survival, 43.0 months vs. 22.4 months; hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.32 to 0.61; P<0.001; and 4-year overall survival, 81.6% vs. 65.3%; hazard ratio for death, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.93; P=0.02). Median progression-free survival was significantly longer with lenalidomide maintenance than with no maintenance (41.9 months vs. 21.6 months; hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.65; P<0.001), but 3-year overall survival was not significantly prolonged (88.0% vs. 79.2%; hazard ratio for death, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.36 to 1.15; P=0.14). Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was significantly more frequent with high-dose melphalan than with MPR (94.3% vs. 51.5%), as were gastrointestinal adverse events (18.4% vs. 0%) and infections (16.3% vs. 0.8%); neutropenia and dermatologic toxic effects were more frequent with lenalidomide maintenance than with no maintenance (23.3% vs. 0% and 4.3% vs. 0%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Consolidation therapy with high-dose melphalan plus stem-cell transplantation, as compared with MPR, significantly prolonged progression-free and overall survival among patients with multiple myeloma who were 65 years of age or younger. Lenalidomide maintenance, as compared with no maintenance, significantly prolonged progression-free survival. (Funded by Celgene; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00551928.).


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis