Validation of proposed diagnostic criteria (the “Budapest Criteria”) for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome

Norman R. Harden(Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz), Stephen Bruehl(Vanderbilt University), Roberto S.G.M. Perez(Leiden University), Frank Birklein(Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz), Johan Marinus(Leiden University), Christian Maihöfner(Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg), Timothy R. Lubenow(Rush University), Asokumar Buvanendran(Rush University), Sean Mackey(Stanford University), Joseph R. Graciosa(Northwestern University), Mila Mogilevski(Northwestern University), Christopher E. Ramsden(Northwestern University), Melissa Chont(Vanderbilt University), Jean‐Jacques Vatine(Tel Aviv University)
Cited by 1,238Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Current IASP diagnostic criteria for CRPS have low specificity, potentially leading to overdiagnosis. This validation study compared current IASP diagnostic criteria for CRPS to proposed new diagnostic criteria (the "Budapest Criteria") regarding diagnostic accuracy. Structured evaluations of CRPS-related signs and symptoms were conducted in 113 CRPS-I and 47 non-CRPS neuropathic pain patients. Discriminating between diagnostic groups based on presence of signs or symptoms meeting IASP criteria showed high diagnostic sensitivity (1.00), but poor specificity (0.41), replicating prior work. In comparison, the Budapest clinical criteria retained the exceptional sensitivity of the IASP criteria (0.99), but greatly improved upon the specificity (0.68). As designed, the Budapest research criteria resulted in the highest specificity (0.79), again replicating prior work. Analyses indicated that inclusion of four distinct CRPS components in the Budapest Criteria contributed to enhanced specificity. Overall, results corroborate the validity of the Budapest Criteria and suggest they improve upon existing IASP diagnostic criteria for CRPS.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis